Ensure at least next generation is happy

Ensure at least next generation is happy

Indian parents pressurise their children to reach heights that were denied to them

Published: 25th September 2021 12:15 

For representational purpose. 

(File Photo | EPS)

By Nanditha Krishna

This year, three children in Tamil Nadu have already committed suicide over NEET. 

The results have not yet come out and one child did not even appear for the exam. Anticipating failure, all three (unconnected) committed suicide.

In 2019, one child died by suicide every hour in India. There were 10,335 student suicides that year, the highest number in the last 25 years.

Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh, in that order, are the five states with the highest child suicide rates, accounting for more than 44% of the suicides.

Psychologists say depression, drugs, mental health factors and examination pressures are the common reasons for child suicides.

A ban on NEET is not possible because the Supreme Court has passed an order. Many years ago, I knew a young boy, an only child, whose mother told him, from the time he was six, that he had to join IIT. 

The child worked hard but the fear of failure made him commit suicide a few days before the entrance exam. 

So do we ban the JEE too?

Indian parents pressurise their children to reach heights that were denied to them. I remember that years ago, when I went to pick up my three-year-old son from his playschool, a mother was scolding her child for not writing in class. 

“How will you ever join IIT at this rate?” she asked the bewildered three-year old, who had no idea what IIT was.

Engineering colleges were once in great demand, but their proliferation has brought down their value. IIT is a passport to the US, while medicine is an assured, well-paying career, so these are in great demand. No parent worries about aptitude. 

The child must fulfil the parent’s obsession. Many years ago, my son got admission to the Department of Chemical Engineering of an eminent university. The day before the fees were to be paid he came and asked my husband and me whether we minded if he did history instead. Not being ambitious parents, we told him to do whatever he wanted. He did history and later completed his Ph.D. in history. So many people berated me for permitting the change, one friend even saying that I did not love my son, for what would he do with history? Well, he is a happy human being, and that matters most.

Examination pressures are exacerbating the mental health of our children. They have to learn by rote and are scared of omitting even a word of teacher-prepared answers. Above that is parental pressure: “I spent so much money on you” or “what will people say if you fail” or “I expect this from you”. The burden is too much. Let us not forget that every student is a child. Some take drugs and slip into happy oblivion, creating social problems. Nobody is talking about drug usage among students. Some run away from home. Others commit suicide.

No other state is opposing NEET. If children from other states can pass the NEET exam, so can the Tamil child. He/she is no less in ability or intelligence. Suicide is most prevalent in government schools where family pressure is very high. Many children are also first-time learners in the family, so the support system is weak. Also, state boards give very high marks, which make a student overestimate his/her ability.

To overcome this, the government must appoint psychologists, backed by psychiatrists, for schools. Children must be screened for aptitude before being permitted to appear for NEET or JEE. 

I know of doctors who left to join the IAS or even become musicians. Each was a medical seat wasted. Today the sky is the limit when it comes to the choice of subjects. 

Subject options when I was in school were limited—either you did maths-physics-chemistry for engineering college, or chemistry-botany-zoology for medical college, or humanities, to join commerce or arts colleges. But the child has nobody to advise him/her. Parents are inflexible. Teachers dare not oppose the parents. To whom will the child go for help? They must also be told that failure is not an end. Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are shining examples.

Every state must improve its educational standards. There could be one “senior” school final (Standard 12) exam equivalent to CBSE for which children with aptitude and ability are coached towards NEET/JEE. Another “high” school final (also Standard 12) could be at a lower level, to accommodate those who are not capable of finishing school at a higher level. 

The Standard 10 exam was supposed to do that, but that has failed. Children must not have expectations beyond their ability, nor should they be pushed by schools and parents to achieve somebody else’s dreams. Schools must have constant aptitude tests. Is the child really fit to be a doctor or is the parent’s ambition pushing him? 

The only solution is counselling and every government, corporation and private school must have a school counsellor who is qualified with an M.A. in educational psychology. Sadly, few colleges offer educational psychology as a subject.

Society must ensure that the next generation is a happy generation. For this, we need understanding parents. We must teach children optimism, self-discipline and the importance of healthy relationships. 

Let them put in their best effort, but not die for perfection. Give children playtime, fun-time and family-time. Discard the useless Standard 10 exam. 

Today a child stops playing from the time he/she enters Standard 9. The next four years are only study, study, study and more study. 

What a life!

Nanditha Krishna
Historian and environmentalist. She also runs many schools and a college
(nankrishna18@gmail.com)

NEET SEAT SCAM

KARNATAKA
Karnataka NEET seat scam: Meritorious students roped in to block seats for small returns

Income Tax officials conducted a search at Congress leader G. Parameshwara’s residence in Bengaluru on Thursday. 

Bhagya Prakash K.

Special Correspondent

BENGALURU 

13 OCTOBER 2019 23:24 IST

Lack of online networking of admission process helping the scam to thrive

A well-oiled informal network of agents and managements of medical colleges in the State have been part of what is now being called the “NEET seat scam” that led to search and seizure operations on two medical institutions by the Income Tax Department last week.

While seat blocking by some merit students, who take a small amount from the agents, has been happening for a few years now, the introduction of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) has increased the seat blocking, sources say. 

With a vast pool of medical colleges available across the country, unscrupulous merit students get admission in one medical college, but end up blocking seat on the advice of agents in several colleges or deemed universities.

“Seats are blocked based on photostat copies of the documents and originals are returned. The lack of network among colleges is being used by agents and managements to block seats. If the student has already got admission, the other students will not know. On the last date, the students opt out of the admission process. 

In the meantime, managements through agents would have identified students who can purchase the seat and citing lack of time for counselling, the seats are allotted to those who would have paid,” said former principal of the Government Dental College D.R. Prithviraj. 

“A nominal penalty is paid by the student for surrendering the seat, but gets paid by the agent.”

Essentially, a merit student with good ranking is blocking the seat from being taken up by students with lesser ranks, but allowing those with capacity to pay more, another source said. 

Sources said that the donation for an undergraduate medical seat ranges from ₹30 lakh to ₹1 crore depending on the college, while the donation for postgraduate medical course can go up to ₹3 crore to ₹4 crore depending on the college and specialisation.

According to sources, agents acting on behalf of the management identify merit students who are willing to be part of the seat-blocking exercise. 

“Original document verification does not happen in the first round, but the students opt out leaving the seat vacant. They continue the same exercise during the second round and the mop up round too. 

In the end, the student has to pay about ₹4 lakh as penalty, which is normally borne by the agent. The student gets paid too.”

Sources said most deemed universities follow a similar practise, but the percentage of seats blocked varies. 

“The full amount collected as donation does not get into the books. The agent will get his commission and management shares a part of the donation. 

A part of it is accounted,” sources said, adding that a number of students, who end up being part of the racket, come from northern states where some of the top NEET coaching centres operate.

Dr. Prithviraj said that to overcome this loophole, a network should be created for NEET counselling, and an online mechanism to find out if students have taken admission in one college but are blocking the seat elsewhere.

“Online admission and use of identities should help break the nexus,” he added.

'Anti-Suicide Fans' Get Backlash For Posing as 'Solution' to Student Suicide Crisi

'Anti-Suicide Fans' Get Backlash For Posing as 'Solution' to Student Suicide Crisis



Many pitched in with their views, stating that the problem needed to be nipped in the bud.

The concept of 'anti-suicide' fans did not sit well with many, who thought that not only did it not address the primary problem, but in itself pointed to a wider issue.

NEWS18.COM
SEPTEMBER 17, 2021, 12:35 IST

Student suicides in India isn’t uncommon. 

Three NEET 2021 aspirants on Wednesday died by suicide, and although the incident has long-drawn implications of a legal fight against the medical entrance examination in Tamil Nadu, it has once again brought to the fore the issue of students’ mental health. 

In February this year, a Chennai student died by suicide allegedly due to the pressure of having to complete the entire year’s syllabus in three months. The deceased, M Praveen, was studying in class 11 at a private school in Kolathur. 

In Hyderabad, a PG student of city-based University of Hyderabad (UoH) allegedly died by suicide in her hostel room on the varsity campus. 

With these being only a few of many incidents, social media is once again discussing “anti-suicide" fans, which are a type of innovation designed to prevent suicides. The fans have an extensible rod, that extends when under pressure, thus making suicide in that manner physically impossible. 

However, the concept of the fans did not sit well with social media, who thought that not only did it not address the primary problem, but in itself pointed to a wider issue.

A tweet reading “‘GOLD Life’ brand ‘Anti Suicide Fan Rod’, manufactured at a factory in Bhandup, Mumbai. Over 50,000 such fan rods are sold/supplied, mainly to Hostels of Educational institutes including IITs, IIMs, AIIMS etc. 

Very great innovation to save human lives," went viral on the microblogging platform, along with a video demonstrating how the fan works being shared by many. 

In response, a Twitter user, who goes by Natasha on the platform, wrote: “Instead of buying ‘anti suicide fans’, shouldn’t educational institutions be investing in fixing the fundamental issues that affect the mental health of students?"

Many pitched in with their views, stating that the problem needed to be helping students, not designing fans emphasizing on the need for counsellors and adequate facilities for mental health in educational institutions. “No, we don’t need an “anti suicide fan" in hostels. We need “in campus counsellors" and a curriculum that doesn’t tie marks to “job readiness" / “self worth"!" tweeted one user.

However, some were reluctant to dismiss the “anti-suicide" fans completely and thought there might be some usefulness to them. “Anti suicide ceiling fans or mental health tratment is a false dichotomy. If the fan stopped one person from committing suicide, it is a worthwhile investment," tweeted a user.

A report by WHO published in 2016 showed that India had the highest rate of suicide in South Asia and no robust strategy to prevent it. 

India’s rate was 16.5 suicides per 100,000 people while globally, the rate was 10.5. And that was before the pandemic struck.

DISCLAIMER: 

This news piece may be triggering. If you or someone you know needs help, call any of these helplines: 

Aasra (Mumbai) 022-27546669, 

Sneha (Chennai) 044-24640050, 

Sumaitri (Delhi) 011-23389090, 

Cooj (Goa) 0832- 2252525, 

Jeevan (Jamshedpur) 065-76453841, 

Pratheeksha (Kochi) 048-42448830, 

Maithri (Kochi) 0484-2540530, 

Roshni (Hyderabad) 040-66202000, 

Lifeline 033-64643267 (Kolkata)

Maharashtra: IIT student dies by suicide

Maharashtra: IIT student dies by suicide

The deceased was identified as Pushpak Sambhe (21), a resident of Wanadongri area

Updated At: Sep 17, 2021 10:14 PM (IST)


Photo for representation.

Nagpur, September 17

A third-year student of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Nagpur died by suicide at his home here, police said on Friday.

The deceased was identified as Pushpak Sambhe (21), a resident of Wanadongri area.

He and his parents had visited their village on Wednesday and Pushpak alone returned next morning to attend online classes, said a police official.

He apparently hanged himself on Thursday afternoon.

The death came to light when his mother asked a neighbour to check on him as he was not responding to phone calls, the official said.

A case of accidental death was registered at MIDC police station and further probe was on, he added. —PTI

AP: Lokesh lashes out on Jagan over student suicide,

AP: Lokesh lashes out on Jagan over student suicide

By Usama Hazari| Published: 13th September 2021 4:19 pm IST

TDP national general secretary Nara Lokesh (File Photo)

Hyderabad: Expressing grief over the latest suicide of a bright IIT alumni in the State, Telugu Desam Party (TDP) national general secretary Nara Lokesh lashed out at the ruling YSR Congress Party on Monday. The TDP lawmaker demanded the YSRCP government to release a fresh job calendar immediately to prevent the rising suicides of young aspirants in the State.

He expressed grief over the suicide of the 25-year-old, Vuppara Veeranjaneyulu, who had reportedly waited for a long time for the job notifications and went into depression after not being able to hear the delay. Vuppara Veeranjaneyulu reportedly took a saree and hanged himself to death from the ceiling fan at his parents’ residence at Yerrakota village in Emmiganur mandal in Kurnool district.

In the press statement, Nara Lokesh said that the suicides of job aspirants would have stopped if the Chief Minister replaced his ‘fake calendar’ with a real ‘job calendar’ in the beginning itself. “Andhra Pradesh had turned into ‘Aatmahatyala Pradesh’ under Jagan rule,” the TDP political added.

Further he stated that the young aspirants voted for the ‘fan’ symbol believing that they would get 2.30 lakh Government jobs, however, Lokesh said the situation turned ghastly as the same job aspirants were hanging themselves from the same fan due to lack of jobs.

He, in the press statement, advised the Government to open its eyes to the deteriorating employment creation situation and initiate efforts to create some hope among the qualified youth. The TDP leader also appealed for assistance and support to be given to the family of Veeranjaneyulu. “He studied hard and earned himself a good name as ‘a son of Goddess Saraswathi’.

The life of a promising youth was cut short now because of the wrong policies of the rulers,” he remarked. Moreover, Nara Lokesh expressed concern that the hard working and intelligent youth were falling victim to the betrayals and false promises of the YSRCP.

“They were working hard to get degrees and spending time, money and energy on training courses. When there were no Government job notifications, they were getting depressed and taking extreme steps,” he stated. The Jagan regime should take all the necessary steps so that no other student loses his life in the State, Lokesh remarked.

JEE (Mains) exam fraud: CBI makes 4 more arrests - including assistant professor

JEE (Mains) exam fraud: CBI makes 4 more arrests, including assistant professor

The Central Bureau of Investigation has made four more arrests, including an assistant professor in the JEE (Mains) exam fraud case.

Munish Chandra Pandey 

September 7, 2021



CBI arrested 4 more accused in JEE (mains) exam fraud case--lab technicians Arvind Saini and Kuldeep Garg, assistant professor Sandeep Gupta and peon Tulsi Ram. (Representative Image)

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested four more persons in connection with the Joint Entrance Examination (Mains) exam fraud case, officials said on Monday.

The arrested accused have been identified as lab technicians Arvind Saini and Kuldeep Garg, assistant professor Sandeep Gupta and peon Tulsi Ram.

Sources said that a few more arrests are likely to take place in the next few days and many people are being questioned in the case.

READ: Fraud in JEE mains: 3 sent to CBI custody, Rahul Gandhi alleges cover-up by govt

Earlier, seven people, including two directors and four employees of a Noida-based educational institute were arrested in connection with irregularities in the JEE (Mains) exams which were held in August last week and September 1 and 2.

After conducting searches and questioning several people, the CBI had on Friday arrested two directors of Affinity Education Private Limited - Siddarth Krishna , Vishambhar Mani Triapthi, four employees - Ritik Singh, Anjum Dawoodani, Animesh Kumar Singh, Employee, Ajinkya Narhari Patil and a private person Ranjeet Singh Thakur.


Fraud in JEE mains: 3 sent to CBI custody, Rahul Gandhi alleges cover-up by govt

Kolkata police busts Jamtara gang, 16 members held


Delhi Police’s cyber crime cell busts fake franchise racket, arrests 4

The JEE is an entrance exam conducted for admission to various engineering colleges in India.

According to the FIR registered in the case, the accused were manipulating the online examination of JEE (Mains) and facilitating aspiring students to get admission to top NITs (National Institute of Technology) in consideration of a huge amount by solving the question paper of the applicant through remote access from a chosen examination centre in Sonepat (Haryana).

“It was also alleged that the accused used to obtain Xth and XIIth mark sheets, the User IDs, Passwords, and post-dated cheques of aspiring students in different parts of the country as security and once admission was done, they used to collect heavy amount ranging from Rs 12-15 lakh per candidate,” said CBI spokesperson RC Joshi on Friday.

Searches were conducted at 19 places, including in Delhi & NCR, Pune, Jamshedpur, Indore and Bangalore, which, according to CBI, led to the recovery of 25 laptops, 7 computers, around 30 post-dated cheques along with voluminous incriminating documents, devices including mark-sheets of students.

ALSO READ: MP govt cancels three MPEEB recruitment exams due to paper leak discovered after Aaj Tak coverage

ALSO READ: Vyapam scam case: Doctor, hired as a proxy to write medical exam, jailed for 5 years

ALSO READ: JEE Main topper from Assam arrested with father, 3 others on charges of using proxy for exam

FAILURES ARE STEPPING STONES TO SUCCESS

 

How YourDOST has grown in the emotional wellbeing space -Richa Singh,

15 lakh+ counselling sessions, 900 experts, 300 institutional clients – how YourDOST has grown in the emotional wellbeing space

By Rekha Balakrishnan

August 25, 2021

Richa Singh, Co-founder and CEO of YourDOST, an emotional wellbeing platform, talks about the company’s growth, its three-pronged approach for corporate organisations, and initiatives during the pandemic.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 has led to several mental health issues compounded by stress, increased responsibilities, loss of jobs, fear of the virus, lifestyle changes, and adjusting to the “new normal”.

Despite the need for intervention, mental health remains a taboo. However, a disruption in offline mental health services has accelerated the demand for services online not just by individuals but also by corporates looking at their employees’ wellbeing.

Richa Singh, Co-founder & CEO, YourDOST

Here’s where YourDOST, an emotional wellbeing platform, has made rapid advances in this space with its multi-pronged approach towards various problems.

The death of a classmate by suicide led Richa Singh, an IIT-Guwahati alumna and a few of her friends, to start Your DOST, an online mental and emotional wellbeing platform, in 2014.

Multi-pronged approach

Over the past seven years, YourDOST has helped individuals and corporates connect to experts, including psychologists, psychotherapists, counsellors, life coaches, and career guides.

Highlighting the impact so far, Richa says, “We have provided more than 15 lakh counselling sessions, have 300 institutional clients and have 900 experts on board. Our clientele includes corporate employees, students, and government projects.”

With corporate employees as its focus, YourDOST has a three-pronged approach to provide diverse solutions.

Richa explains the first step is to unlock an individual’s potential through one-on-one counselling sessions.

“We also offer several self-help programmes that promote self-care through mindfulness techniques, self-help models, self-reflective tools to develop resilience. These will help prevent inertia, burnout or disengagement.”

Curated programmes, for instance, around gratitude, or for women going on maternity leave, internet addiction, etc., also help individuals better themselves.

The second approach is to amplify team performance through communication interventions through training to build more emotionally resilient teams.

“The third approach is to help organisations establish an empathetic culture. If an individual seeks to support, but if the company is not aligned with the idea, it will not impact. We inspect the leadership, how it inspires teams, and what they can learn,” she adds.

YourDOST also works with the government on projects to support students from low-income backgrounds. It also assists the National Skill Development Council to enable young adults to be more emotionally resilient towards their careers.

ALSO READ

This IIT alumnus has stopped close to 70,000 people from committing suicide

Increased engagement

The YourDOST team

Richa believes the pandemic has helped mature the curve faster, with more people talking openly about emotional wellbeing.

According to her, corporate engagement has increased by 400 percent, and YourDOST has facilitated several specialised programmes during both waves of COVID-19.

She elaborates, “During the first wave, companies went through different challenges like layoffs and doing things entirely online. We helped them navigate these challenges. The second wave saw people handle grief, loss of team members, etc. We helped managers support their teams better, especially those impacted by the virus.”

For founders and entrepreneurs, too, the journey has not been easy. “We have seen a 100 percent increase in founders’ engagement because this is an emotionally challenging time for them. It’s lonely at the top. We have a special programme to support them on their journey with individual coaches and specific goals,” she adds.

During this period, YourDOST partnered with the Government of Haryana to run a special mental health helpline for people from low-income backgrounds. The team also trained people to become first responders to make them better equipped to handle dire situations.

Richa agrees that women have borne a large brunt of the pandemic, juggling work and home.

The platform introduced several programmes to support women with relationship issues, raising children, time management, prioritisation, and more.

Richa is happy that there is no more awareness on mental health, given that more people, especially film stars and cricketers, are talking about it.

But the situation is not optimistic. “India is first in depression, second in anxiety, and 36.6 percent of global suicides are in India. In a survey conducted during the pandemic, we found that 55 percent of Indians experienced a significant rise in stress levels, including anxiety and anger. Mental health needs to be addressed seriously.”

Richa is modest about YourDost’s achievements. “I think we have just scratched the surface with our numbers. There are a lot more people to be covered in India. We plan to work with more corporate organisations, startups, and others. We want to be at a place where we can take care of the emotional well being of the entire ecosystem of organisations in India and championing mental health and wellbeing,” she says.

YourStory’s flagship startup-tech and leadership conference will return virtually for its 13th edition on October 25-30, 2021. Sign up for updates on TechSparks or to express your interest in partnerships and speaker opportunities here.

For more on TechSparks 2021, click here.

Applications are now open for Tech30 2021, a list of 30 most promising tech startups from India. Apply or nominate an early-stage startup to become a Tech30 2021 startup here.

Edited by Megha Reddy

'There Is Nothing Meritorious about IITs - Wire

Interview | 

'There Is Nothing Meritorious about IITs,' Says Prof Who Resigned Over Casteism

Vipin P. Veetil speaks about his journey at IIT Madras and what really goes on inside India’s ‘Institute of National Importance'.

Professor Vipin P Veetil. Photo: By arrangement.
Manasi Pant

Last month, Vipin P. Veetil, resigned as an associate professor at IIT Madras, alleging that he faced caste-based discrimination. In his firmly worded resignation email, he stated that “the discrimination came from individuals in a position of power, irrespective of their claimed political affiliations and gender”. 

Snippets of his email were circulated widely on the Internet, throwing light on the issue of caste-based discrimination at IIT Madras.

Allegations have been made over time that casteism thrives in IITs. From the casteist and ableist remarks of professor Seema Singh at IIT Kharagpur to the violation of reservation for faculty recruitment across its campuses, Veetil’s is symptomatic of a much larger issue. 

In fact, as of 2019, IIT Madras was already under the heavy scrutiny of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes when the institute reported five alleged deaths by suicide within 11 months.

Also read: ‘Disgusted’: Over 1000 IIT Alumni Write to Kharagpur Director on Professor’s Casteist Abuse

While we hear considerable outrage against caste-based discrimination faced by students from the marginalised communities within IITs, faculty members are not exempt from such mistreatment either. RTI data from 22 of the 23 IIT campuses across India reveals that “none of the 22 IITs [in this study] have more than six teachers belonging to the Scheduled Tribes community, while 18 of them have ten or fewer candidates from the Scheduled Castes category. Seven IITs had ten or fewer faculty members from the other backward classes community”. 

Moreover, a Newslaundry article quotes the experience of Subrahmanyam Sadrela, an associate Professor at IIT Kanpur:

“…soon after Sadrela’s appointment, he says some of his colleagues said his appointment was “wrong”, that he didn’t deserve to be a faculty member at the institute, that he could not speak English perfectly and was mentally unfit…Sadrela was slapped with charges of plagiarism in his thesis and threatened with the revocation of his PhD degree, almost a year after he alleged caste-based discrimination in the campus.”

Obsession with ‘merit’

As India obsesses over the value of “merit”, it becomes increasingly important to hear the stories of those impacted by caste-based discrimination. Does the argument for merit truly make sense? How do caste dynamics play out in educational spaces? What does standing up for yourself yield in a predominantly upper-caste institution? I had the opportunity to hear directly from Veetil. He spoke about his journey at IIT Madras and what really goes on inside India’s ‘Institute of National Importance’.

When I first tried reaching out to Veetil, I was told categorically by a student that he did not wish to talk to the media. Weeks later, surprised by his response to my email, I asked him what made him change his mind.

“Now, since the media has lost interest, I have gained interest!” he laughs. “I started receiving calls from several prominent news platforms. But one of the things I did not want to do was just give news bytes because this kind of a case requires extensive, thorough treatment. Knee-jerk reactions don’t help. Only two of some 20 media outlets mentioned that they want to do long-form writing on the issue. I also felt like my mind needs to be a little distant from the issue to engage with the media. I took a break for 2-3 weeks and went to Kodaikanal. Now, I’m willing to speak at length about the events that have occurred.”

Recalling his early days at the institute, Veetil says that his experiences with caste started even before he had officially joined IIT Madras as an associate professor, some time in July 2018.

“As a postdoctoral fellow, I had been applying for several jobs at universities, and IIT Madras called me for an interview. I had my interview in the morning; no complaints about that process. But in the evening, I was sitting with another individual who had come to apply for the same position. A car drove in, and a man stepped out of the car, 60-65 years old perhaps. He was from the Brahmin caste; his janeu was falling out of his shirt. He picked a key from the guesthouse reception and returned almost within the next five minutes shouting furiously at the receptionist. The latter – I do not know which caste he was from – was shaking and shivering, must be around 25-26 years old.”

“The issue was as simple as this: someone accidentally gave him the key to a room that had not been cleaned. All he had to do was let them know that he requires the key to a cleaned room. The receptionist was profusely apologising, but this man kept shouting, ‘How dare you give me this key?'”

“I intervened by saying, ‘You can’t shout at him’. He had luggage and was probably coming in from the airport. I pointed out that if he tried this behaviour somewhere abroad, say, in the US, people would call the cops. He’s a violent man, and this would not be tolerated. The man kept his hand on my shoulder, sort of physically intimidating me, and asked me, ‘Who are you?'”

Veetil describes this as his first glimpse into the sense of ownership a man with such privilege can have at IIT. “I realised that the fellow being shouted at could not even do anything about it: he’s a contractual employee, his manager is also a Brahmin, the director of the institute is a Brahmin. And this receptionist has a family to take care of.”

He reports that there were also times when people at the institute openly asked for his last name to figure out his caste. “Sometimes, I’d be surprised that they’d ask my last name. Sometimes I would not tell them. And sometimes, people would ask me differently: ‘Are you a vegetarian?’ which is a proxy for finding out your caste. You would overhear certain women speak about how someone in their family is getting married to a Marathi Brahmin girl. So you would know those caste conversations are prominent on the campus.”

Contrary to what one may assume, Veetil’s resignation mail was not the first time he had written to the institute to address the problem of caste-based discrimination.

Also read: IIT Madras Faculty Member Resigns Citing Caste Discrimination at Institute

“I think one of the first emails I wrote was about six-seven months after I’d joined IIT Madras. It was sent to all 700-800 faculty members, including the director, IIT core members, everyone… I had asked about the caste composition of deans and directors at IITs. As far as I know, all the directors of IITs since its founding have been Brahmins, so have been the vast majority of deans.”

“All I asked for was some data in a one-line email. Suddenly, there was a surge of emails sent to me saying, ‘If you go down the line that Vipin is suggesting, this institute would be destroyed’. But I hadn’t even said anything! People may have assumed that I was pushing for more reservations, but I hadn’t said anything myself. One person said that statistics are a way to lie – and you should know that these are fairly intelligent people! They are professors at IIT with PhDs in very technical subjects. They were trying to insinuate that the hiring system must be just as the directors are hired by the Government of India, the deans by the Directors, so on and so forth.”

“In response, I wrote them a long email highlighting that in government organisations, there is little to no incentive to hire based on merit. If I am an employee with a fixed salary, I have no incentive to hire on the basis of merit. If anything, I have all the opportunity to hire based on my caste preferences, my ideological preferences, my gender preferences, or my regional preferences. I wrote an elaborate email explaining this, citing literature in economics to substantiate my argument. I presented this as an opportunity for the institute to recognise this lack of incentive and be self-reflective, observe how people of one caste or regional group tend to get hired or promoted. This email, again, got a fair amount of pushback.”

A class in session at the IIT Madras’s department of physics. Source: IIT Madras.

‘No redressal mechanism for casteist abuse’

.
Despite raising the issue of rampant casteism at IIT Madras multiple times, Veetil did not feel that there were adequate grievance redressal mechanisms in place that would truly offer a safe space for marginalised groups to be heard.

“I have now filed a complaint with the institute’s grievance committee. But I got to know this committee only after I worked here for two years and four months. And I got to know through personal efforts while I was trying to file a complaint with the OBC commission – which I have done now as well.”

“There is no orientation telling you that there are mechanisms in place if you are facing trouble, which parties you can approach – none of that. The one place where we do have some kind of functionality is sexual harassment. We do get some sort of training owing to the Government of India legislation. That gives you the details of who you can approach and what the protocol is, but there is no such thing for caste-related questions.”

“Again, how well these things function is another matter. But formally, you don’t even know that these protections exist. Besides, this grievance committee is not specific to caste. If you see the email that I’d written, I had said that the government should institute a panel to study the experiences of people from marginalised castes on campus. The larger idea is that there should be a specific SC/ST and OBC cell in the same way that sexual harassment complaints are dealt with in a specialised manner.”

When asked about the importance of caste-specific grievance redressal committees, he says, “All societies are societies in transition. You never step into the same river twice. But some societies are more in transition than others, right? India is particularly a transitional society. In the next 20-30 years, you would see many first-generation professors, first-generation judges, prime minister’s economic advisors, government council members. In the last 20 years, we have seen first-generation college-goers. Now, they will be seeking jobs in positions their parents simply did not have access to. As they get these positions, it is crucial to have systems in place where we don’t assume prior knowledge – because oppressed groups are not necessarily getting this prior knowledge from their parents and their grandparents.”

“This is something that the United States does well: they have this whole orientation at workplaces and universities. Because they have so many people from outside the country, they are very transparent about how their system works. This is something we need to do in India. It’s not that we don’t have it solely because of ignorance – withholding information is a way to maintain caste hegemonies.”

Veetil is not hesitant to call out the “people in power” who he accuses of discrimination. “In my case, there were four people who were primarily involved. And then, of course, some people are sitting on the fence. The ones who are quiet are also as liable as anyone else. They want to play the game on both sides.”

“One of the four people is the chair professor at the department. He’s been here for donkey’s years – did his PhD at IIT Madras, got a job at IIT Madras, and he’ll retire in three years. He’s well entrenched in the system – a very powerful man. Two others involved are the department heads – one was the head when I joined, and one who is the head currently. The last person is also a professor who has worked here for, I believe, more than two decades now.”

“These are all people who decide whether an assistant professor should be promoted, an associate professor to a complete one. They define which resources to float to whom, from housing to pay. They also ascertain who has access to certain facilities on the campus. Overall, they are people capable of creating hurdles in your academic and professional life.”

So, what were these hurdles? “One month after I joined, I mentioned that I want to teach a new course called Economic Network Analysis – nothing in the course content is offensive to anybody. In fact, it could be terribly boring for some. I want to point this out because the trouble that arose was not because of the course. It’s not like I was teaching Economics of Discrimination. A small committee makes important decisions in the department, the department consultative committee, which said in an email that I could not teach this course because I was on my probation period. This email was being passed around, and someone called S, who was upper caste but not a Brahmin, said that ‘this is the time to observe his behaviour’.”

“One or two associate professors pointed out that there was no such rule prohibiting one from starting a new course in the first year, and in fact, there had been people who had done the same within their first year. But you should know that lots of people in the department already know each other and there is a network of doing favours for each other back and forth. I did not come into this department knowing anybody. I do my work, and that should be good enough.”

“I asked them to give it to me in writing that I cannot start the course in my first year, and they refused to do so – it was just an arbitrary decision. Here is also where the question of merit comes in. There is no objective judge of merit in this system; there is a fair amount of arbitrariness at every level. I felt down, confused, didn’t know what was going on or whom to approach.”

Further elaborating on the fallacy of a “meritorious” institute, Veetil talks about a strange incident he allegedly caught at IIT Madras.

“Months go by, and I see the chair professor of the department doing something very strange in the recruitment process of PhD fellows. They’ve divided the entry into economics department into three: economics, technology in public policy and health. Usually, there is an entrance exam and then two interviews. The chair professor in the department had been writing and grading the questions for the entrance exams for the “technology and public policy” track for more than 10 years! There’s no other professor who’s written or graded the paper for years. So, we had a public institution admitting students without adequate checks and balances!”

As Veetil raised this issue, he made several suggestions to make the admission process more fair and inclusive. He reportedly encouraged that more than one person write the question paper and that more than one person, who had nothing to do with setting the questions, also grade each paper. He also reported that he suggested they stop recording the students’ names and simply note their role numbers instead.

“How is it that this institution has gone on for so long recording the names of students? The name will tell anyone the gender, religion, and caste of the person. This is not acceptable because nobody is beyond the deeply ingrained biases in India – I am not beyond it either!”

“Still, so far, there was no clear case of discrimination that I could make. But I was really upset about three months after that. 

In 2020, a new person joined the department by the name of A. He’s from the Brahmin caste. He floats two new courses in his first year, and both are approved! When this was happening, I explicitly asked the question, ‘Are the rules different for Brahmins?’”

“None of the four people who created trouble for me in starting a new course raised any issue in A’s case. Even the person who said my behaviour needs to be ‘observed did not say a word against A. 

Is it that if you’re from a backward caste, you are more animalistic and, I don’t know, you go around biting people, which is why you need to be ‘observed’? 

And if you’re from a privileged caste, your behaviour is naturally decent? 

The same associate professor who supported me when I was advocating for my course brought up the issue: 

‘You didn’t let Vipin teach.’ But nothing came of it, and they pushed through their agenda. I was very disappointed.”

‘Merit at IITs is a fallacy’

Once again, the system is made such that “merit” is constantly questioned in those coming from marginalised groups. “This also takes energy away from your research and your work. I hope you don’t face similar challenges, but you may face problems as you advance in your career in areas that a specific group dominates: this could be gender, religion, caste, among others. You have to prove yourself and advance in these spaces solely through your work! When you are forced to fight the opposition, your energy deviates from this work. Then they get the opportunity to say that your work is not ‘good enough’.”

“Again, this is where the question of merit and caste, merit and gender would come in – they are deeply interwoven with each other. Think of it as a carpet; you cannot just pick on one thread and separate it from the others. That would move other threads in the carpet as a whole.”

He mentions that those who stand against the system get implicitly punished: “Some associate professors have struggled quite a bit themselves in trying to get a promotion because once you start raising your voice, you are punished by the system. People can always come up with some arbitrary reason as to why they did not promote you.”

Also read: Caste and Meritocracy Keep India’s Top Institutions Running. At What Cost?

Veetil laughs at the IITs’ preoccupation with “merit” and how they used it to justify not filling in reserved seats in faculty recruitment. “Usually, the tone that I hear when I hear about reservations for women, someone from a backward caste or any under-represented community, is that ‘Oh, these people need extra support,’ you know? Even people who sympathise with the idea say things like, ‘Even though they are not as good in terms of merit, if we “support” them, they might perform better.’ At this moment, they think of it as a ‘compromise’ to enable the long-term ‘meritorious’ recruitment of people from these communities. But why do you presume that you are currently recruiting based on merit at all?”

“You see, there is no entrance exam to be a professor at IIT or to be in the prime minister’s economic advisory council. 

There are a series of judgments, in fact, based on a broad set of criteria that you can’t pin down. If you look at Indian society over the last thousand years or so, there is no reason to presume that people would not exhibit their preference for caste, gender, region, and others. There is no merit! This is what I pointed out in my long-ish email – and that didn’t go so well.”

He explains how his “merit” was disregarded during his time at IIT Madras:

“The currency within which we operate are journal publications, in scientific journals. These journals are ranked. One such ranking agency is the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC), and they rank journals by A*, A, B, C and so on. I’ve had about 4-5 publications in journals, of which two are in A* ranked journals. And this man X, who created so much trouble for me, has only one A* publication! This is despite all the decades he has spent here, all the PhD students he has had and all the resources that have been allocated towards him! Even this one A* publication of his is co-authored with 21 people. In my publications, one is co-authored with two other people and the other with just one. So, it is fallacious to think that merit somehow is a determining factor of success here.”

Post his resignation, the conversation online was not just in support of Veeting; many opposed him and believed that his allegations were baseless. He reads out some of this opposition from Twitter. “One person has left a comment on my resignation: ‘What discrimination? He got admission to his degree and post-graduation studies through his caste quota. He had no fees for admission forms. Also, his job, he grabbed based on his reservation category. Till here, he did not find any discrimination between general and reserved category.’ This is one person. Another person says, ‘Reserved quota students expect students to respect their mediocre skills. They won’t get a job without a quota. Good that he quit.’ The general perception is that I was just not good enough.”

“Here’s the fact of the matter: My undergraduate degree is under the general category. My post-graduate studies and PhD studies are from outside India. I even got into IIT through the general category. I never used my OBC certificate. I only got it after I began to be discriminated against because I needed constitutional protection.”

“Now, I want you to note that it’s not that IITs do not follow reservations. They have implemented reservations very well for the last 50-60 years – reservations for Brahmins. That too, mostly for male Brahmins. And more recently, for female Brahmins, but in a limited way. But their implementation is great, right?”

“What we are talking about is counter-reservation. We want to remove this reservation system. We want a truly open and meritorious society. I shouldn’t even have to say this; it is so obvious.”

Biased system

Interestingly, soon after Veetil’s resignation, the IIT Madras administration held a meeting with Arun Halder, vice-chairman of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes. An article on The Hindu reported that the IIT Madras director “assured him [Arun Halder] that there was no discrimination”. I asked Veetil if he has any thoughts on this conclusion.

IIT Madras. Photo: IIT-M official website.

“I’m glad you asked! I do have some thoughts. The Tamil press had a go at the NCSC and asked the vice-chairman, ‘How did you find out that there is no discrimination?’ 

And this person essentially says that he had asked the administrators, who claimed that there is no such discrimination at IIT Madras!” he laughs.

“One of the questions which were asked was that if there is no caste-based discrimination, why is it that the SC/ST seats have not been filled?

 For instance, in my department, as far as I know, we have only one person from a Scheduled Caste of the three dozen or so faculty members. I could be wrong, but the number is not going to be very different. Of course, this is not the only metric – we also have to look at how one is treated once they come into the organisation. Nonetheless, it’s an important metric: why haven’t the seats been filled? This commission member responded to the Tamil media by parroting the line that the IIT administration has previously said: that they have not found people who qualify for these positions. I don’t know; this may be true. But how do you go about establishing this as the truth?”

Veetil describes an elaborate study that needs to be conducted to reach any conclusion about the presence of caste-based discrimination at IIT Madras or to determine whether these seats are left empty because of a genuine lack of talent.

According to him, it is not something one can conclude within a matter of hours in conversation with a biased administration that will naturally try to defend itself. “The whole point of the NCSC is to uphold the rights of the people from Scheduled Castes! It is not to simply believe the IIT Madras administration but to study whether their claims are true or false. Such a study would require at least six months, if not a year, with experts from various fields for it to be a thorough exploration. It needs massive amounts of resources to be pumped into this. I am baffled beyond imagination as to how this man was able to ‘figure this out’ within a matter of a few hours!”

In addition to the fact that the rules for reservation are already violated in IITs, a recent ministry of education panel actually advocated for IITs to be exempt from reservation in employment altogether. Education minister Dharmendra Pradhan also defended IIT Madras when asked about the caste-based discrimination within the institute.

“Also, note that the caste census in India has not been released, so the constitution of OBCs in the population is far larger than the current reservation percentage accounts for. So, when we talk about filling these seats, we are not talking about a proportionate representation – it is the minimal representation that is not fulfilled,” clarifies Veetil.

The fact that the NCSC and IIT Madras have both concluded that the institute is free from caste-based discrimination has severe implications for the study the grievance committee is still conducting on Veetil’s case.

IIT Madras has most recently even told Times Now that the institute does not allow any form of religious or caste-based discrimination to occur, and that proper grievance redressal mechanisms are in place. This stands in contrast to what Veetil had to say.

“If the administration has claimed that there is no discrimination at the same time that an inquiry into my case is still in progress, how objective can this investigation be? They already seem to have a conclusion! There are serious issues here.”

I asked him one final question: “Is there hope for change?”

“It’s essential to understand that no one person, government or ideology is going to ‘fix’ everything. I used to have these grand beliefs, and this is not how my life has turned out. I used to think, ‘If I get the best grades at the undergraduate level, life will be all good. If I get my PhD from this university, life will be great.’ Many of these things have indeed happened, but frankly, life has not been as great as I thought it would be! It is all an ongoing process. The more we look at day-to-day matters, the more we raise issues at small levels, the more we are likely to progress as a society without violence erupting in the process.”

“One thing I’d also want you to notice about India is that all this discussion about the Left and the Right is fallacious nonsense. What it always comes down to is caste. Whether it is a presumably communist person who is the head of a department or an RSS follower who is the head of a department, they’re always Brahmins. This is important to note because many people get used as cannon fodder for ideology in India, to initiate conflict or violence with an opposing group, whoever that may be. But ultimately, when it comes to these elite positions, these decision-making positions, marginalised groups get left out.”

Veetil explains how there is little to no incentive in the government to hire based on merit. “Quite honestly, I’d have to give you a somewhat disappointing answer. I think it’s good to push for reservations to be more actively pursued. I think it’s good to push for the study that I had asked to learn about the experiences of people under the SC/ST and OBC category in the institution. It’s good to have permanent representation through an SC/ST commission and an OBC commission. All this is good to do.”

“Nonetheless, at the end of the day, there is minimal incentive in the government system to hire based on merit. All we can do is put some pressure on the government to do better. Now, we cannot just look at IITs individually and focus on internal changes but must also look at the education system as a whole. The government regulations right now make it difficult to start a university for profit, which is one thing that would incentivise people to recruit on the basis of merit and not caste-based privileges. We need more freedom for women and backward castes.”

“For many years, we were not able to do this in the name of socialism. The Left felt that the Americans were imperialists. This may be true, but we (marginalised castes) have different problems. For us, Americans can be friends! We may find that people with a different colour of skin have been more friendly to us than the people who have the same colour of skin. More recently, the idea of allowing foreign universities in India is at times rejected in the name of nationalism. So this is the interesting thing: whether the ideology is socialism or nationalism, it’s the women, the backward castes, who bear the brunt of their ideals. We bear the cost of it. It is the group of elite who sit in air-conditioned offices which benefit from peddling these ideologies.”

As we acknowledge the mammoth task that is transforming India’s education system inside out, Veetil laughs, “We can only do as much as we can. It is all a social process.”

Manasi Pant is a gender and sexuality campaigner at Jhatkaa.org.

 

Caste Discrimination at IIT-Madras? Asst Professor Complains to OBC Commission

Vipin P Veetil says he was prevented from teaching a course even as a Brahmin faculty member was allowed.

NIKHILA HENRY

Updated: 12 Aug 2021, 3:03 PM IST

i

At 22 years, Vipin P Veetil travelled across Europe on an Erasmus Mundus post graduate scholarship. At 31, he finished his PhD in economics from George Mason University, Virginia and by the age of 33, he was a post doctoral fellow at Sorbonne University in Paris.

Despite his impressive academic track record, the most difficult question Veetil faced within one month of joining IIT-Madras in 2019, as an assistant Professor in the department of Humanities and Social Sciences, was - 

“What is your caste?”

Veetil recalls that the question was put to him by a professor of economics who had taught at IIT-M for over 10 years.

This and other such incidents led the IIT-Madras faculty member, to resign on 1 July 2021. 

Alleging caste discrimination, Veetil told The Quint in an exclusive interview, “In IIT-M, you can be blind about your caste but others may not be blind about it. They will know or would want to know”.

 

Veetil has now withdrawn his resignation and is back at IIT- Madras to fight out the complaint he had lodged in July. The 36-year-old assistant professor who hails from Kerala belongs to the Maniyani (OBC) caste.

 

The faculty member's allegations about caste discrimination come at a time when the Centre is planning to introduce 27 percent OBC reservation in medical and dental courses across the country.

Also Read

How Anti-Mandal Protests Stoked ‘Caste Fires’ in Our Young Minds

Complaint at OBC Commission

Veetil has also filed a fresh complaint (a copy of which is with The Quint) with the OBC Commission in New Delhi, requesting the body to investigate the reported case of caste discrimination. In the complaint dated 5 August, Veetil writes, “This letter does not capture all of the discrimination I have faced at the department or the caste dynamics which regulates and shapes our lives at the institute. These will hopefully come up in the course of our interaction during the investigation”.

The two-page complaint could possibly be first of its kind, as it is a faculty member of the institute who has raised an allegation of caste discrimination before the OBC commission.

 

Earlier, in 2015, a section of IIT-M’s students had accused the institute management of caste discrimination when the administration de-recognised Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle (APSC).

APSC now functions as an independent student body in IIT-Madras.

While Veetil is gearing up for a long legal battle, what stands out about his journey in IIT-Madras is that, it appears, caste continues to haunt individuals who hail from historically marginalised Dalit-Bahujan communities even when they do well, academically, without constitutional safeguards such as reservation.

Casteism In The IITs: A Thriving Culture Of Subordination And Hegemony,

Casteism In The IITs: A Thriving Culture Of Subordination And Hegemony

By Manasi Pant
-August 4, 2021


Trigger Warning: Caste-based discrimination, mention of death by suicide

Recently, former Assistant Professor at IIT Madras, Professor Vipin P Veetil, resigned from the institute with a firmly worded email, the reason being that he was subjected to caste-based discrimination ever since he joined in 2019.

The Professor from the Humanities and Social Sciences Department alleged that, “the discrimination came from individuals in a position of power, irrespective of their claimed political affiliations and gender.” Screenshots of his email were circulated widely on social media, bringing to light the issue of caste-based discrimination among faculty members at IIT Madras.

But is this an isolated issue?

A thriving casteist culture

The news of professor Veetil’s resignation comes soon after the IIT Kharagpur incident where a professor reportedly abused students verbally during an online class. This was in an English preparatory course for students from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Class (OBC), and Persons With Disability (PWD).

She reportedly dared the students to go to the Ministry of Minority Affairs if she had offended them. The impunity with which the professor allegedly made ableist and casteist remarks, suggests that a culture of rampant casteism is allowed to thrive in the IITs.

This incident triggered widespread resistance against the unnervingly high academic pressure exerted towards students in the IITs and the disastrous consequence it can have on their mental health. 

But is academic pressure the sole factor to blame? From a Muslim student allegedly being asked, ‘Are you Al-Qaeda?’ to a PhD scholar reportedly being treated as a ‘lower creature’, a culture of exclusion seems to be prevalent in the IITs

IIT Kharagpur Image: Hindustan Times

On November 9th, 2019, Fathima Latheef, a student at IIT Madras, reportedly died by suicide in her hostel room within the first year of her master’s in the humanities and development studies department. Her father, Abdul Latheef, informed that his daughter had left a suicide note allegedly holding a professor at the institution accountable for the step she took, and he also alleged that she faced religion-based discrimination.

This incident triggered widespread resistance against the unnervingly high academic pressure exerted towards students in the IITs and the disastrous consequence it can have on their mental health. But is academic pressure the sole factor to blame?

From 2006 to 2019, the reported number of suicides in the IIT Madras campus totalled up to 18—of which one person was a faculty member. A Newslaundry article shows us many more instances of alleged caste and religion-based discrimination across the IIT campuses.

From a Muslim student allegedly being asked, ‘Are you Al-Qaeda?’ to a PhD scholar reportedly being treated as a ‘lower creature’, a culture of exclusion seems to be prevalent in the IITs.

Image: Vimocafe

A survey cited in the Economic & Political Weekly studied how perceptions held of students at IIT-Banaras Hindu University were influenced by their caste. Thirteen percent of student respondents from the SC/ST category reported that they felt the teachers’ attitude towards them was hostile.

When asked about the perceived academic ability of students in the SC/ST category, 61 percent of the respondents in the general category felt that it was ‘less than others’. In comparison, 46 percent of SC/ST category students also thought it was ‘less than others’.

Mistreatment and unsolicited comments are not targeted only towards students from marginalised communities. While one may believe that a faculty member holds significantly more power than a student, the discrimination based on caste often trumps the occupational hierarchy in an institute

IIT Madras had, in 2019, already been under the radar of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes when it reported five alleged cases of death by suicide within 11 months. There were also concerns raised about the admission barriers faced by students from marginalised communities.

Also read: What IIT Kharagpur Professor’s Abusive Remarks Tell Us About Casteism In Educational Institutions

Between 2009 and 2019, only 47 SC students and six ST students were admitted to IIT Madras for the Master of Science programme, which has a total strength of 2,320. Within the same timeline, only 213 SC students and 21 ST students were awarded PhDs out of a total of 4,000 PhDs given out. We must view Professor Veetil’s resignation with this context in mind.

Casteism overshadows the ‘power’ of faculty members

Mistreatment and unsolicited comments are not targeted only towards students from marginalised communities. While one may believe that a faculty member holds significantly more power than a student, the discrimination based on caste often trumps the occupational hierarchy in an institute.

Such is the example of Subrahmanyam Sadrela, who joined IIT Kanpur as an associate professor in the Aerospace Engineering department in 2018. A Newslaundry article reports his experience as follows:

“…soon after Sadrela’s appointment, he says some of his colleagues said his appointment was “wrong”, that he didn’t deserve to be a faculty member at the institute, that he could not speak English perfectly and was mentally unfit…..Sadrela was slapped with charges of plagiarism in his thesis and threatened with the revocation of his PhD degree, almost a year after he alleged caste-based discrimination in the campus”

Image: Huff Post

With this context, it is no surprise that RTI data cited in a Hindustan Times article reveals that, even as of June 2021, “none of the 22 IITs [in this study] have more than six teachers belonging to the Scheduled Tribes community, while 18 of them have ten or fewer candidates from the Scheduled Castes category. Seven IITs had ten or fewer faculty members from the other backward classes community”.

Essentially, none of the 22 IITs were following the mandated reservation rules in faculty positions. Additionally, Professor Veetil also alleged that he faced discrimination from people in ‘positions of power’.

This illustrates how the IITs are enablers of an already casteist society. The caste system, which has been a long-standing form of systemic oppression, far overshadows the relative ‘power’ that a faculty member holds

Pawan Goenka, the chairperson of the board of governors of IIT Bombay and IIT Madras, said, “Currently, the IITs have a fairly large number of vacancies which they are trying to fill, but sufficient high-quality candidates have not been available across all categories”.

Image: Pinterest

Indeed, people in positions of power at the IITs have found themselves a ‘justification’ for violating reservation rules in faculty recruitment. As recently as in January 2021, a government panel suggested that all 23 IITs should be exempted from reservations in faculty positions altogether.

This illustrates how the IITs are enablers of an already casteist society. The caste system, which has been a long-standing form of systemic oppression, far overshadows the relative ‘power’ that a faculty member holds.

India’s ‘Institutes of National Importance’ can do better. They must.
Sensitisation, unlearning biases: 

The way ahead

We can see how Professor Veetil’s resignation is a symptom of a much larger issue. Being discriminated against to the point that he was forced to resign is not only a consequence of caste-based discrimination but a win for caste hegemony. It serves to keep educational spaces exclusionary, intolerant, and inaccessible to the majority of the population.

Learning about anti-caste movements, the history of caste-based oppression and challenging the current notion of merit can help contextualise caste-based discrimination and allow privileged groups to understand that their power comes from the socio-cultural capital they extracted from the oppression of others

Education is always termed as the “magic bullet” for progress. It has the capacity to empower marginalised communities. However, so long as caste-based discrimination pervades educational institutes, this magic bullet holds little power. For education to maximise its potential of being transformative and liberating, several changes must be made at the structural level.

Image: Firstpost

An article on The Swaddle insists that, in order to be inclusive, education institutions must commit to “undoing the idea of merit as a random consequence of individual ability”. Staff and faculty must recognise their social position as a factor determining their ability.

Students and teachers alike should be shown that brahmanical hegemony still shapes our notion of capability and that it has more to do with denying communities opportunities for progress than with one’s personal talent.

Another important note in the article is that education is inherently political, and must be taught as such. If caste-based privilege still pervades education, this privilege must be named and critically analysed. This is necessary to give people the opportunity to “unlearn supremacist and oppressive ways of thinking and acting,”.

Learning about anti-caste movements, the history of caste-based oppression and challenging the current notion of merit can help contextualise caste-based discrimination and allow privileged groups to understand that their power comes from the socio-cultural capital they extracted from the oppression of others.

Image: The Conversation

Schools and colleges must also do away with the “hidden curriculum” that is taught in educational spaces. This refers to “the norms and values that are implicitly, but effectively taught in schools and that are not usually talked about in teachers’ statements of ends or goals.”

Examples of this include referring to students as “boys and girls”, thereby reinforcing the gender binary. A childhood studies scholar, Sarada Balagopalan, reports that during her fieldwork, many teachers spoke about Dalit and Adivasi students demeaningly with statements like, “these children are slow”.

Such implicit notions are internalised by students and staff of educational institutions. The hidden curriculum must be done away with through sensitisation training and teaching of the history of caste-based oppression. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment must mandate such core courses and training workshops for education to be truly accessible, inclusive, and prejudice-free.

Also read: The Impact Of Social Disadvantage & Implicit Bias On Intellectual Performance

In his email, Professor Veetil has asked that the institute set up a committee consisting of representatives from SC, ST, and OBC communities, and psychologists to study the experience of SC, ST, and OBC faculty members. ChintaBAR, an independent student organisation at IIT Madras, has further demanded the setting up of functioning SC, ST, and OBC cells for specifically addressing grievances related to caste-based discrimination.

These are just starting points for a long battle against casteism in India’s ‘prestigious’ institutions. They are extremely necessary to take. If you wish to join the fight against casteism at IIT Madras, you may look through and sign our petition.