Student suicides rising, 28 lives lost every day - The Hindu

Student suicides rising, 28 lives lost every day

Shuvabrata Garai

CHENNAI, JANUARY 29, 2020 19:47 IST


According to a 2012 Lancet report, suicide rates in India are highest in the 15-29 age group — the youth population. | Photo Credit: K.R. DEEPAK

The NCRB data shows that 10,159 students died by suicide in 2018, an increase from 9,905 in 2017, and 9,478 in 2016.

“Live a little every day, ek hi zindagi mili hai (You have got but one life).” These were the last few words found on an eight-page-long note written by a deceased postgraduate student at the Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad (IIT-H). The student was found dead on July 2 last year in his hostel room.

Every hour one student commits suicide in India, with about 28 such suicides reported every day, according to data compiled by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). The NCRB data shows that 10,159 students died by suicide in 2018, an increase from 9,905 in 2017, and 9,478 in 2016.

Maharashtra had the highest number of student suicides in 2018 with 1,448 — almost 4 suicides every day — followed by Tamil Nadu with 953 and Madhya Pradesh with 862.

Between 1999 and 2003, 27,990 students ended their lives; 28,913 between 2004 and 2008; and 36,913 between 2009 and 2013. The 2014-18 period saw a 26% jump from the preceding 5-year period to 46,554.

Hold a mirror to education system
Suicides in premier institutes such as IITs hold a mirror to the education system. As per data from the Department of Higher Education, under the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), 27 students across 10 Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) committed suicide between 2014 and 2019. IIT Madras tops the list, with seven students losing their lives during this period.

In April last year, 19 students in Telangana committed suicide in a week after the State’s intermediate results were announced. Two years back, in another tragic incident in Madhya Pradesh, 12 students including six girls ended their lives in a single day after the release of the board exam’s results.

Kota, primarily known as a coaching centre hub, has seen a series of student deaths every year. As per the data available from the district administration, 58 students ended their lives in Kota between 2013 and 2017.

Rate highest in the 15-29 age group

According to a 2012 Lancet report, suicide rates in India are highest in the 15-29 age group — the youth population. The report says that among men, 40% suicides were by individuals aged 15-29, while for women it was almost 60%.

Mrugesh Vaishnav, president of the Indian Psychiatric Society said, “Stress, anxiety disorder, depression, personality disorder — all these result in mental illness that leads a student towards suicide. This happens when the students are not familiar/satisified with his or her surroundings.” Relationship breakdown is another leading cause.

In 2017, Lokniti-CSDS released a survey which showed that 4 out of 10 students went through depression. The survey conducted in the age group 15-34 years also found that one out of every four youth moderately suffered from depression, loneliness, worthlessness and suicidal thoughts. Six per cent of them got suicidal thoughts at least once.

Md. Sanjeer Alam, faculty at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, New Delhi, said, “A student commits suicide when he doesn’t get emotional support at the time of crisis. This might happen when individual expectations are too high. Parental and peer pressure also have an adverse effect.”
A.K. Joshi, Professor and Head of Sociology, Banaras Hindu University, stated, “Academic stress is an obvious factor for students taking their own lives. After studying to a certain level when they feel they are supportless or he/she can’t fulfil their own and their parents’ role expectations, a role conflict starts within the student. In this type of situation students feel they are left without any choice and so they take such an extreme step.”

Pradip Kumar Saha, Director of Institute of Psychiatry, Kolkata, said, “Fear of failure is a leading cause for suicide among students. When students pass through an unsuccessful phase, everything seems pessimistic to them. They feel their future is bleak and this may result in committing suicide.”

Those in distress or having suicidal tendencies could seek help and counselling by calling any of the following numbers:

Telangana Roshni - 040-6620 2000

Andhra Pradesh 1Life - 78930-78930

Karnataka Arogya Sahayavani - 104

Tamil Nadu Sneha - 044- 24640050

Delhi Sanjivini, Society for Mental Health - 011-4076 9002, Monday-Saturday, 10 am -7.30 pm

Mumbai BMC Mental Health Helpline: 022-24131212

Vandrevala Foundation: 18602662345/18002333330

I Call - 022-25521111, Monday to Saturday, 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.

ASRA - 022 2754 6669

The Samaritans Mumbai: 8422984528/842984529/8422984530, 3 p.m. -9 p.m., all days

Bengaluru Sahai - 080-25497777, 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Kochi Maitri — 0484-2540530, Chaithram — 0484-2361160

Kolkata Lifeline Foundation - 033-24637401/32

FAILURES MAKE PEOPLE MORE DETERMINED TO SUCCEED

PLEASE READ THIS IF YOU ARE FEELING DOWN

FAILURES MAKE PEOPLE MORE DETERMINED TO SUCCEED

ONE HAS TO FAIL IN ORDER TASTE SUCCESS

MORE THE FAILURES GREATER THE SUCCESS

WATCH THIS VIDEO OF PEOPLE WHO FAILED YET SUCCEEDED

THANKS TO 

AWESOME  INDIA 

FOR THIS CREATION

New suicide plan based on lived experience - Daily Telegraph Australia

Few Tips for the Indian Govt on Suicide Prevention

New suicide plan based on lived experience

A $64 million radical government plan will dramatically overhaul the national approach to suicide prevention, focusing on some of the nation’s most vulnerable groups.

Sue Dunlevy, National Health Reporter, News Corp Australia Network

|January 29, 2020 8:50pm
The rate at which people take their own lives has been increasing in recent years.

Exclusive: 

Suicide will no longer be treated only as a mental illness and prevention will shift away from doctors, psychiatrists and hospitals into community programs under a revolutionary new government program.

Health Minister Greg Hunt will on Thursday announce $64 million in funding for five key suicide prevention measures including new funding for people who have made a suicide attempt and relatives of people who took their own life.

Suicide will be deemed as much a financial, social and employment stress problem as a mental one and there will be a push to build strong social connections and better communities for those affected.

The funding comes after Prime Minister Scott Morrison received the draft report on suicide prevention from his new Suicide Prevention Adviser Christine Morgan in December and signals a dramatic reform of the national approach to suicide prevention.

Mr Morrison set his government the ambitious goal of working towards zero suicides when Ms Morgan was appointed to the role in July last year.

And she has controversially suggested the need to move away from a medicalised model of dealing with suicide.

Prime Minster Scott Morrison’s Suicide Prevention Adviser Christine Morgan. Picture: AAP

“Whilst anyone that attempts suicide is certainly in mental distress it does not mean they have a mental illness,” Ms Morgan said.

Half of the people who commit suicide never come into contact with mental health services so a successful prevention approach needed to look outside health services, she said.

It was the social determinants of health that were often behind suicide, issues like housing security, financial security, food security, trauma and relationship break ups, she said.

If these real life problems could be solved the person may not even need mental health care, she said.

The extra funding will bolster community based mentoring and support programs.

“In talking to individuals and communities over the past six months, it has been clear to me that we need to co-design our suicide prevention approach in a way that is led by those with lived and living experience of suicide,” Ms Morgan said.

“We often think about services and systems and what is available, rather than truly understanding what people need and what has worked, and not worked, for them in the past. We need to put people back at the centre of policies and planning.”

The rate at which people take their own lives has been increasing in recent years.

More than 3000 people committed suicide in 2018, around eight people per day.

The rate at which people take their own lives has been increasing in recent years and it is now the leading cause of death for young Australians, accounting for more than one-third of deaths among those aged between 15 and 24.

“This is a national tragedy. Every life lost to suicide has a devastating impact on families, friends and communities. Every life lost affects our whole country,” Mr Hunt said.

Ms Morgan consulted with individuals who had attempted suicide and families and her initial advice based on the experience of these people was to intervene early, focus on specific at-risk groups, strengthen families and communities, and ensure that all government services – not just health services – are working to reduce risk.

One suggestion was that all frontline public servants in Centrelink, immigration, tax and other office receive training in suicide prevention.

People who have attempted suicide will get three months of individualised support.

Her report will be made available shortly for public consultation and members of the public are being urged to provide feedback before the final report is presented to the Government in July.

IF YOU NEED HELP



For help with emotional difficulties, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or www.lifeline.org.au

For help with depression, contact Beyond Blue on 1300 224 636 or at www.beyondblue.org.au

The SANE Helpline is 1800 18SANE (7263) or at www.sane.org

For more information on how to support others who might need help and what warning signs to look for, visit: Conversations Matter.

WHO WILL BENEFIT
These initiatives will focus on supporting some of the most vulnerable groups, including:

* Australians who have been discharged from hospital after a suicide attempt.

* Families and carers who have lost a loved one to suicide.

* Young Australians, particularly in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and in regional and rural areas.

* Australians in crisis, and in need of immediate assistance.

WHAT THE $64 MILLION INCLUDES
*An additional $7 million to the Beyond Blue Way Back Support Service and HOPE services which provides a support worker to people who have attempted suicide for a three-month period to connect them to services and provide tailored individualised support.

*An additional $10 million for the StandBy program which provides support and one-on-one counselling to people who have lost a loved one to suicide because evidence shows they too are at increased risk of suicide.

*$9.8 million to youth support including

* $3 million increased funding for the Raise Foundation a mentoring program that connects children in schools to community mentors who help with life issues

*$4.4 million for Headspace to provide training to teachers and students in schools on suicide prevention and help equip schools with knowledge on how to respond if there is a suicide event in the school. There will also be funding to extend Headspace centres in Karratha, and Port Hedland, Roma and Emerald will be expanded.

*$1 million for the Mental Health Commission to work on a child mental health strategy (this was announced last year).

* The government will bring forward funding for 8 adult mental walk in centres. People experiencing a mental health crisis will be able to walk in to these centres and be assessed by a mental health professional and sent on to a mental health nurse or a drug and alcohol counsellor or a psychiatrist and be given a case manager who will follow up their care and connect them with support at Centrelink, or social workers, financial counsellors or psychiatrists if needed.

*$12 million will be spent extending the government’s 12 suicide prevention sites and $1 million will be provided to allow Christine Morgan’s office to draw together results from these sites and combine them with 14 other prevention programs being run by the states.

Some of the $64 million has previously been announced.

Why are students committing suicide?

The fundamental premise of the safe spaces is that no student should feel tense to go to the school because he or she is afraid of the classroom|Representational image

OPINION

Why are students committing suicide?

The empathic way of solving the problems should be the foundation of the peaceable classroom where the student learns to take responsibility for their actions





Paranjoy Bordoloi
Jan 28, 2020, 3:51 PM

New Year (2020) has just started. Thousands of Class XII science students have now already taken their New Year resolution to get a seat in one of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) for a bright future.

This has been a regular practice for the last few decades of many bright science students of the country. Nothing unusual about it for the students as well as their parents until recently. The statistics revealed by HRD ministry regarding IITs raised many questions. During the last 5 years, more than 50 students committed suicide in 23 IITs. IIT Guwahati tops the list with 14 cases of student committing suicide. The recent data shows that students’ suicide cases have been reported from Indian Institutes of Managements (IIM) as well as many premier educational institutions of the country. According to National Crime Records Bureau latest available records, a student commits suicide every hour in India. (Retrieved from www.fairobserver.com/region/central_south_asia/india-student-suicide)

The above discussion leads to introspect on why students committing suicide even after reaching premier educational institutions like IITs and IIMs? These institutions normally ensure their tickets to work either in USA or in any European country. There are various reasons cited by psychologists as well as researchers of the country that academic stress, intense competition for a better pay check from professional occupations including parents and peer pressure. The current situation makes many students stressed, anxious and depressed. The study routines and draconian rules from primary schools have been compelling many students to commit the highest crime of humanity.

During the last 5 years, more than 50 students committed suicide in 23 IITs. IIT Guwahati tops the list with 14 cases of student committing suicide. The recent data shows that students’ suicide cases have been reported from Indian Institutes of Managements (IIM) as well as many premier educational institutions of the country. According to National Crime Records Bureau latest available records, a student commits suicide every hour in India

How to reduce student suicide cases in India? There is no single and easy answer to this very sensitive issue. However, the repair work needs to be done from their school days. Revisiting our education environment indicates that there is no institutional structure to allow students to express their emotions of depression and stress openly. Hence, there is an alternative concept of education which is getting recognition slowly worldwide, which is Conflict Resolution Education- popularly known as CRE.

The advocates of the conflict resolution discipline have been able to enforce this concept in the school education system of many countries. The CRE critically analyses the contemporary classroom settings on following key points:

• Are there safe spaces for collaborative learning?

• How conflict is handled in the classroom?

• Are we following the empathic way of solving problems in the classroom?

The fundamental premise of the safe spaces is that no student should feel tense to go to the school because he or she is afraid of the classroom. Similarly, no teacher should ever fear to walk into a classroom. The second question reflects that conflict is natural in our classroom; hence it should be understood properly so that it can become an opportunity to learn and create. Thirdly, how conflict is being handled in the classroom and school problem solving mechanism.

During a US Consulate funded school project for schools of North East India, the writer himself experienced a different situation while interacting with a group of school teachers of the premier educational institutions of the region. When we asked the group of teachers about the conflict management in schools, then most of the teachers admitted that there is a need for an organized mechanism to address conflicts in the school. Only mere counselling to the students should not be able to help student to overcome their emotional problems.

The advocates of CRE also stress on the Peaceable Classroom concept in schools. This focus on teaching students the foundation abilities, principles, and one or more of the problem-solving processes of conflict resolution

CRE encouraged teachers to use cooperative learning where students work in small groups to accomplish shared learning goals. The academic learning comes through different group works. It stresses on constant efforts to identify conflicts arising in the school between students, between teachers and students, teachers and management. A more holistic approach should be adopted by introducing the concept of peaceable classroom, which integrates conflict resolution into the curriculum and into the management of the classroom and uses the instructional methods of cooperative learning and academic controversy.

The advocates of CRE also stress on the Peaceable Classroom concept in schools. This focus on teaching students the foundation abilities, principles, and one or more of the problem-solving processes of conflict resolution. A comprehensive school methodology that builds on the peaceable classroom approach by using conflict resolution as a system of operation for managing the school.

William Kreidler, a pioneer of the peaceable classroom, views the classroom as a caring and respectful community. According to him a classroom should have qualities of cooperation, communication, emotional expression, appreciation for diversity, and conflict resolution. It should encourage cooperation among student of the class and transform it into a learning community. The sharing of knowledge should not happen as a monologue rather dialogue style should be adopted.

The important conflict resolution skills like negotiation (assert own needs as well as understanding that a sustainable solution requires to address the needs of others) and mediation (help people to guide through the process of negotiation to mutually satisfactory solutions) should also be added in this innovative approach to classroom

The empathic way of solving the problems should be the foundation of the peaceable classroom where the student learns to take responsibility for their actions and develop a sense of connectedness to each other and with the school environment. They should develop group norms and be able to understand different points of view which foster their tolerance.

The Peaceable Classroom for junior classes uses storytelling, role-play and games that promote cooperation and encourage interaction among students and increases their tolerance. Anger management is also an integral part of the Peaceable Classroom. For the upper classes, it teaches students to train other students as peer mediators, holding school assemblies and demonstrations, and focuses on transformation skills like self-reflection and active listening. The important conflict resolution skills like negotiation (assert own needs as well as understanding that a sustainable solution requires to address the needs of others) and mediation (help people to guide through the process of negotiation to mutually satisfactory solutions) should also be added in this innovative approach to classroom.

The current scenario like the increasing trend of student committing suicides enhances for an alternative approach of CRE to make classroom peaceable. This can be the right response which allows identifying student’s depression, frustration as well as empowering them to overcome their emotional issues. To prevent student suicide cases, we need to address student’s depressive behaviour at the right time. Be it school or be it IITs and IIMs, the CRE needs to be implemented in the curriculum systematically. The first step should school teachers are trained in CRE so that they could infuse its elements in their school teachings. This may be the response to prevent suicidal tendency of students as this will allow them to construct right values and attitudes desired by the family and society

(The author is a Fulbright Conflict Resolution Fellow. Views expressed are his own. He can be reached at paranb@rediffmail.com)

Is society’s idea of success harming our children?

Imagine: 

Is society’s idea of success harming our children?

The idea of success is hugely problematic when from an early age, we are recruiting our children into believing that there is one right way to live their life.

Written by Shelja Sen | Published: January 25, 2020 6:05:04 am

From an early age we recruit our children into believing that there is one right way to live their life. (File photo)

Depressed Indian boy sitting on floor & holding his head. Frustrated with exam pressure.

“I am going to kill myself,” is what Jahaan told me in his first session. He had been brought to me by his parents as they were concerned that he was not studying. He was 18 years old, in class 12, preparing for his board exams which he did not plan to take as according to him, “I would be dead by then”. There was a steely determination in his tone that made it evident to me that he had been thinking and possibly planning for some time. His parents, oblivious to all this, were extremely frustrated with him for being “ so lazy” and “setting himself for failure.”

He came from a family of engineers and in class 11, he had been forced to take science and enrolled in coaching classes despite his reluctance. It is the same old story — Jahaan wanted to be a filmmaker but his parents insisted that engineering would give him a “secure future”. Slowly, all things that he enjoyed were taken away from him — cricket, hanging out with friends, his camera, drums and instead he was expected to get up early in the morning to study, go to school and straight to tuitions from there, to return for more studies and then back to the same back-breaking cycle again. After all, it was his “board year” and “it would decide the rest of your life”. Ironically it had, as he had come to a decision that he did not want to live anymore.

I have met so many Jahaans where the adults in their life have decided what is better for them and they are left with a sense of despair. You might say that parents do know what is best for their kids and Jahaan would have wasted precious years of life on filmmaking and those years would have been better spent studying engineering and getting a stable job and successful life. Of course, we need to deconstruct what success means in the general sense in the society — money, promotions, fancy cars, etc. A ladder where the higher you go, the more you get. But then, why is it that so many people step off from this ladder or find that every rung up in the ladder makes them more and more miserable? The so-called success should make us happier, but in reality, it is not.

Off the chart suicide rates of IIT aspirants in Kota coaching centres should shake us out of our collective eroded stupor of what we see as the making of a” good life”. A study conducted by ASSOCHAM in 2018 (Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India) found that 42.5 per cent of employees are struggling with depression and/or anxiety in their high-pressured jobs. They had possibly climbed the ladder of success and security to find it is an illusion.

This idea of success is hugely problematic as right from an early age we are recruiting our children into believing that there is one right way to live their life. It is a myth and instead I would urge you to redefine the idea of a good or I should say good enough life, with three aspects at its core — agency, purpose and connection. Let me unspool it:

Agency

Suppose, rather than telling them all the time, we started asking young people what they wanted to do in their life, about their aspirations and their dreams. Their answers might be simple, concrete and far-fetched, but that is just the beginning. It sets their intentions which works at pulling them forward with much greater force than all the pushing we adults end up doing. When I asked Jahaan what his dreams were, he told me that from the time he was little, he had been fascinated by wildlife and watching documentaries on it. He wanted to travel the world, visit wildlife parks, sanctuaries and oceans and capture them on his camera.

Purpose

As Jahaan shared his dreams with me, his whole face lit up as he explained to me the different kind of cameras that wildlife photographers used, the skill required in just waiting and observing for hours, the adventure of going to remote places nobody had been to. The same boy who had walked in with such despair and determination to end his life was painting his dreams to me with such purpose and passion.

Connection

We are hard-wired for connections, for belonging, for seeking out people who will accept us the way we are, who understand us and share what we value. Jahaans of our world are locked in a constricted world of regimented classrooms, coaching classes and heavy textbooks, which does not leave much room for seeking connections, fun and laughter.

It is also important to state here that Jahaan’s parents were not some demonic, insensitive tyrants. They were well-meaning, loving parents who wanted the best for their child. They had bought into society’s propaganda of success. When we started unpacking the problem, they could step back and reflect on what they really wanted – their son’s happiness and more than that, his life. And the turning point was when they became witness to our discussions where they watched their son come alive — what do you want to do? What does it say about your values, your dreams, your aspirations? Who are the people who matter to you?

If you want to observe a fertile ground for depression, then all that you have to do is understand how the board exams are designed in our education system. I have a daughter sitting for one, so I know what I am talking about. From November onwards all that she has been doing is taking exams – first her finals, then the preboards and followed immediately by the boards which will end in March. For almost five months children are expected to lock themselves up in their rooms, or in their tuition centres and cram. There is no personal agency, no purpose (except scoring high marks which is quite meaningless) and no scope for connection. No wonder we see so many young people with severe mental health problems during this period. Try talking to any of the boards like CBSE, ICSE and explain the sense of agency, purpose and connection to them and it might be like banging your head against their rusty walls.

Take any young person who is struggling with depression and you will find they have been stripped of agency, purpose and connection like Jahaan. And what turns things around for them is when they are able to connect to these vital ingredients for a meaningful life. This is true not just for young people, it is true for each one of us who are stuck in the narrow definition of success. We all need a sense of being in charge of our life, doing things that we see as worthwhile and make deep connections that bring us joy and belonging. Jahaan did something about it; what about you?

For all the latest Parenting News, download Indian Express App
© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

Four years after death, Anti-CAA protesters pay tribute to Vemula - Hindustan Times

Four years after death, Anti-CAA protesters pay tribute to Vemula

MUMBAI Updated: Jan 18, 2020 00:10 IST

Yesha Kotak and Eeshanpriya MS




Protests against the oppression of the marginalised and the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) came together on Friday, when the city saw people gather in Dadar and Byculla.

Four years after Dalit scholar Rohith Vemula committed suicide following caste-based harassment at the University of Hyderabad, approximately 100 city students and activists marched to Chaityabhoomi in Dadar. They had come together to remember Vemula, and raise their voices against violence against students and the CAA.

A protester said, “These new rules [CAA] are discriminatory to many tribal communities. Without proper documents, even these communities will have no proof of their citizenship in the country.”

At Agripada in Byculla, a massive crowd gathered at the Young Men’s Christian Association ground on Friday evening. Organised by Mumbai Citizens’ Forum, with over 20 organisations from south Mumbai under its umbrella, the protest was led by women from Muslim, minority and marginalised communities, and registered its dissent to CAA and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).

Speaking at the protest, Nationalist Congress Party’s Supriya Sule said, “The Maharashtra government will not let anything unfair happen in the state.” Students from New Delhi’s Jamia Millia Islamia, Jawaharlal Nehru University; Aligarh Muslim University (AMU); Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Siddharth College and Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT-B) in Mumbai also attended the protest and some of them spoke to the crowd that grew to at least 2,000 by late Friday evening.

Srijan Chawla, 22, a student of Jamia Millia Islamia, said, “I have come from Delhi to speak at the protest. I have never been more aware of my religion than I am now, since the government started talking about CAA. I have come to show solidarity with all protestors.”

In addition to speeches, there were street plays, poetry readings, and patriotic songs. Sania Mariam, 26, a student of IIT-B said, “We are here to show solidarity with each other and with people in the entire country who are facing violence due to our protests against CAA and NRC.”

Institutional Casteism: 4 Years After Rohith Vemula, Has Anything Changed?

Institutional Casteism: 4 Years After Rohith Vemula, Has Anything Changed?

By Suchitra
-January 17, 2020

The whole country shook in 2016, when Rohith Vemula, a brilliant PhD scholar was institutionally murdered for standing up against the casteism of the Chancellor of the University of Hyderabad. Rohith Vemula, a Dalit student and a PhD candidate, had been suspended along with four others after a complaint by the local unit of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the BJP.

He was constantly questioned on his caste, and his abilities were never trusted with because it was assumed that he was not ‘meritorious’, something that Savarna discourse still doesn’t address.

Unfortunately, due to systemic injustice and institutionalised bigotry, Rohith Vemula wasn’t the first person to be institutionally murdered, hundreds were before him, and after him there were several. Yet there’ll always be a time pre-Rohith Vemula and post-Rohith Vemula in memory, because his funeral brought the casteism in campuses into mainstream media. His death had caused protests and outrage across India.

YET THERE’LL ALWAYS BE A TIME PRE-ROHITH VEMULA AND POST-ROHITH VEMULA IN MEMORY, BECAUSE HIS FUNERAL BROUGHT THE CASTEISM IN CAMPUSES INTO MAINSTREAM MEDIA

His suicide note said:

“The value of a man was reduced to his immediate identity and nearest possibility. To a vote. To a number. To a thing. Never was a man treated as a mind. As a glorious thing made up of star dust. In every field, in studies, in streets, in politics, and in dying and living.”

Post Rohith Vemula: Has anything changed?

Even after his death, there hasn’t been much change.

Even in the University of Hyderabad, where the gruesome incident unfurled, the Vice Chancellor, Appa Rao Podile is still in office.

In December, a month before his suicide, Rohith wrote to the Vice Chancellor of the University of Hyderabad, asking him to give poison or ‘a nice rope’ to Dalit students. In the letter, he identified himself repeatedly as a member of ‘(the) Dalit self-respect movement’ and suggested the persecution on campus for ‘students like me’ was so widespread that the campus should facilitate euthanasia.

“I HAVEN’T SEEN A DRASTIC CHANGE IN ANYONE’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS CASTE OR CASTE-BASED DISCRIMINATION. NO WORKSHOPS OR SENSITISATION PROGRAMMES HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED,” SAID A STUDENT
“I haven’t seen a drastic change in anyone’s attitude towards caste or caste-based discrimination. No workshops or sensitisation programmes have been conducted,” said a student to The Print.

We still see various incidents of institutional casteism. The unfortunate thing is that an issue like this is only brought to the forefront when a victim of institutional casteism dies, which is very upsetting.

Rohith Vemula was murdered at University of Hyderabad, Dr. Payal Tadvi faced somewhat similar abuse at her Mumbai medical college while nineteen-year-old Fathima became the latest victim of this string of institutional murders.
Even after graduation from prestigious educational institutions, Dalit students often come from severe poverty, face prejudice on campuses and experience job discrimination. Such individuals’ ability is always questioned because of their caste despite their success.

EVEN AFTER GRADUATION FROM PRESTIGIOUS EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, DALIT STUDENTS OFTEN COME FROM SEVERE POVERTY, FACE PREJUDICE ON CAMPUSES AND EXPERIENCE JOB DISCRIMINATION. SUCH INDIVIDUALS’ ABILITY IS ALWAYS QUESTIONED BECAUSE OF THEIR CASTE DESPITE THEIR SUCCESS.

Not long ago the brahmanical faculty at IIT Kanpur held a PhD award from a scientist who happened to belong to the scheduled caste community, accusing the scholar of plagiarism, when everyone knew the senior scholar’s track record as brilliant. His father passed away thinking about the same thing that his son may not be getting his hard earned PhD.

Lessons on disparities in castes start early. In Tirunelveli schools about 400 miles south of Tamil Nadu capital, primary school children wear coloured wrist bands to signify their castes (Janardhanan).

The ‘merit’ claim has always been forced down the throats of those who supported reservations or affirmative action whenever the marginalised have lifted their voices against questions of equal opportunities in education. The ‘merit’ vouched for by the established order, died along with S Anitha, a student who scored 98 percent (1,176 marks out of 1,200) in her plus two examinations. Anitha, a Dalit, was the daughter of a daily wages manual labourer and had hoped to become an MBBS practitioner. She was also one of the petitioners who moved the courts to scrap National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) which was deemed pro-urban, pro-coaching and discriminatory towards the Central Board candidates.

A student from Tirupur committed suicide in May 2019, barely hours after the NEET results were announced. S Ritusree, who was only 17 years old, committed suicide by hanging in her room, and was declared dead at the hospital. She had scored 98 per cent in her 12th board exams. It came two years after the suicide committed by S Anitha.

Discrimination based on caste impacts students even at India’s flagship medical school, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). In 2006, the allegations of caste-based violence against oppressed AIIMS students were investigated by a government Committee. Some of their results include teachers deliberately ignoring students because of their caste background, examiners asking students about their caste, students from the upper caste pressuring students from the lower caste to transfer to different hostels. Most Dalit students entering higher education institutions are usually learners of the first generation, coming from poor families and often struggling to fit in.

MOST DALIT STUDENTS ENTERING HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ARE USUALLY LEARNERS OF THE FIRST GENERATION, COMING FROM POOR FAMILIES AND OFTEN STRUGGLING TO FIT IN.

Dr. Payal Tadvi, a junior doctor who committed suicide after caste-based harassment, had been denied compulsory medical leave. Despite the terms, accused physician Bhakti Mehare refused Tadvi’s leave and taunted her with caste based insults for trying to avoid duties. She has blamed her seniors Hema Ahuja, Bhakti Mahare and Ankita Khandelwal in a note retrieved from Tadvi’s phone. Seven months before this, she had confided to a friend that three college seniors bullied her, subjecting her to casteist slurs and other forms of caste violence. Tadvi’s experience of bullying, humiliation and abuse would culminate in her being institutionally murdered in her hostel room at her college. She was a member of the Muslim community of Tadvi Bhil, a Scheduled Tribe, and would have been the first doctor from her community in 80 years, lost to institutional casteism.

SHE WAS A MEMBER OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY OF TADVI BHIL, A SCHEDULED TRIBE, AND WOULD HAVE BEEN THE FIRST DOCTOR FROM HER COMMUNITY IN 80 YEARS, LOST TO INSTITUTIONAL CASTEISM.

Fathima Lateef, 19, was a bright student. A humanities program undergraduate at IIT Madras, she was murdered institutionally as a result of harassment. Twenty-five people, including professors and students of IIT Madras, are on the inquiry radar of the police. “Harassment and caste discrimination had forced my daughter Fathima to take the extreme step,” Fathima’s mother had said after the suicide.

These institutional murders represent the problem with casteism in institutions in that despite reservation ensuring reserved seats for the marginalized, society still is not equal.

Can the HRD ministry answer as to what it did to the investigation in the murder of Rohith Vemula? What happened in the case of Dr. Payal Tadvi? Which happened to the disappearance of Najeeb? And what is the latest update in solving Fathima Latheef’s murder? These are structural issues, and they must be taken seriously. If our institutions become killing fields of scholars from Dalit, Adivasi and Muslim communities then it’s time to look at their hierarchy seriously. Are there teachers in these institutions from these sections? Are there ample students in these sections? Is there appropriate percentage of representation from their communities? If not, then why? There are absolutely no redressal mechanisms to anyone facing institutional casteism.

But despite the outpouring of sympathy for Rohith, the mainstream narrative shows no support for the movement, media still uses the words ‘suicide’ and not ‘institutional murder’. There is no joint call for action to address the issue at hand other than omnipresent solidarity. Ignorant savarnas continue to throw around terms like caste-blind, acting as though the lives and struggles of Dalit people are research proposals for them to dissect and discuss.

Dalit-Bahujan-Adivasi-Muslim students stay outside a particular domain or are unable to join other classes; they are able to enter the Brahmanic groups, such as societies and student associations, they are alienated, discouraged and driven to suicide. Many of us, even those who are well-meaning, are waiting for a murder to show our outrage and anger, no matter how ridiculous and futile it is then. Yet caste is around us, in everyday life. It is up to the rest of the student body to rise in indignation as Dalit students are humiliated in class, made to sit apart, failed in exams, ridiculed in interviews and their spirits shattered; institutional casteism must be addressed properly.


ROHITH DID NOT STICK BY WHAT WAS EXPECTED OF HIM BY BRAHMINICAL NOTIONS: HE WAS A DALIT BUT REFUSED TO BE A VICTIM.

Rohith was beyond his caste. He was an educated and strongly expressive student leader who was prominent and conscientious of various social injustices. He was a talented academic, gaining entry to a prestigious graduate science program and a highly competitive fellowship for national research. Rohith was admitted by general admissions and not by reserved seat. Politically and socially conscious, Rohith did not stick by what was expected of him by brahminical notions: he was Dalit but refused to be a victim.

Share this:

IIT Madras report on Fathima Latheef suicide ‘silent on religious discrimination’ - The Print

IIT Madras report on Fathima Latheef suicide ‘silent on religious discrimination’

Internal report of IIT Madras says Fathima Latheef was a bright student and scored well in all subjects barring one, and that caused her distress.

TARUN KRISHNA and KRITIKA SHARMA 

15 January, 2020 2:07 pm IST

Fathima Latheef | By special arrangement

New Delhi: The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras in its internal report on the suicide of a student, Fathima Latheef, makes no mention of “religion discrimination” as one of the reasons why she ended her life, as alleged by her family.

The report sent to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) says Latheef was a bright student and scored well in all subjects barring one, and that caused her distress.

Latheef, a first-year Master’s student at IIT Madras, had committed suicide in her hostel room on 9 November. Her family had alleged that she ended her life because she had been discriminated against on the basis of her religion.

Following the allegations by the family, the HRD Ministry had asked the institute to submit a report on the incident. IIT Madras is said to have submitted the report last month.

“The report that was submitted to us says Latheef was a brilliant student and scored well in all subjects except one and that became the reason for her distress,” said a senior official in the ministry, who is privy to the report.

“Neither the report, nor the FIR says anything on religious discrimination. It is something that the student’s parents have been alleging,” the officer added.

Another senior officer in the ministry, also privy to the details of the report, confirmed to ThePrint that the report is with the ministry. He also said it does not mention anything on religion. “There is no mention of religion in the report from IIT. It’s an allegation made by the family,” said the officer, who did not wish to be named.

The Print contacted the HRD ministry’s spokesperson for an official response but received none. This report will be updated if and when the ministry responds.

IIT Madras Director Bhaskar Ramamurthi also did not reply to queries on the report. He, however, said the institute was cooperating with investigating agencies. “As you may be aware, the suicide of Fathima Latheef is being inquired into by the Tamil Nadu Police and was subsequently handed over to the CBI. IIT Madras is fully cooperating with both agencies in their investigations and awaits the findings,” he said.

Family had alleged religious discrimination

Latheef’s family had been alleging that she faced religious discrimination in the institute. Her father Abdul Latheef had even met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to demand a proper investigation in the case.

Following his request, the CBI is now investigating the case.
According to Latheef’s sister, Aisha, she had found notes on her phone that hinted that the Master’s student was depressed for the last one-and-a-half months. “I saw a lot of notes on her phone, which show that she was depressed for the last one-and-a-half months,” Aisha had told The Print in an earlier conversation.

This led the family to believe that she was being harassed at the institute. According to the family, Latheef had also named professors, who were allegedly harassing her, in her notes.

Tamil Nadu government transfers IIT-M student’s suicide case to CBI - Hindustan Times

Tamil Nadu government transfers IIT-M student’s suicide case to CBI

Fathima Latheef from Kerala’s Kozhikode had committed suicide in her hostel room in IIT-M campus on November 9. Her father Abdul Latheef had alleged that religious discrimination at the IIT-M campus had driven her to kill herself.

SOUTH Updated: Dec 16, 2019 05:00 IST

M Manikandan

Hindustan Times, ChennaiFathima Latheef’s father had claimed that there were some notes left by his daughter on her mobile phone, though no suicide note was found from her room. (PTI File Photo )

Thirty-six days after a 19-year-old woman student of IIT-Madras committed suicide, the Tamil Nadu government on Saturday referred the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) citing a communique from the Centre suggesting the transfer.

The move came after Madras High Court on Friday questioned why the state government should not transfer the case to the central agency.

Fathima Latheef from Kerala’s Kozhikode had committed suicide in her hostel room in IIT-M campus on November 9. Her father Abdul Latheef had alleged that religious discrimination at the IIT-M campus had driven her to kill herself.

He had recently met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah. After meeting Amit Shah, Latheef said the Union minister had promised to initiate a probe by CBI.

The state government’s order shifting the case from the Central Crime Branch and Crime Investigation Department (CBCID) to CBI said the decision was taken after the Tamil Nadu director general of police (DGP) JK Tripathy and Chennai City Police commissioner AK Viswanathan had given their nod for the transfer.

It also said that the Union ministry of personnel, public grievances and pensions asked the state administration to furnish the proposal regarding the transfer of the case. The ministry had also sent a letter regarding the Union home ministry’s direction suggesting the transfer of the case to the CBI.

“Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit had also extended his consent to the extension of powers and jurisdiction of members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the state of Tamil Nadu to investigate the case…” the state government’s notification read.

Fathima Latheef’s father had claimed that there were some notes left by his daughter on her mobile phone, though no suicide note was found from her room.

He also alleged that in her notes on the phone she had accused IIT-M professor Sudharsan Padmanaban. Latheef charged Padmanaban of religious discrimination against his daughter.

Policy | Kerala’s model worth emulating to curb exploitation on campuses - Money Control

Policy | Kerala’s model worth emulating to curb exploitation on campuses

The scrapping of internal assessment will not ensure complete elimination of discrimination and sexual harassment on the campuses, but it will surely address a major part of the vulnerability of girls and members of depressed classes to those with an evil mind.

Moneycontrol Contributor@moneycontrolcom

K Raveendran

The Kerala government has shown a model that India can follow by deciding to scrap the system of internal assessment of students in colleges. The move could not have come a day sooner.

Internal assessment had become a tool for exploitation at the hands of the teachers and supervisors, some of who behave like predators.

 Particularly vulnerable are girls and students belonging to depressed classes, who still face discrimination of various kinds at schools, colleges and offices. Instances of girls and Dalit students driven to the desperate act of taking their lives due to harassment by their supervisors have become more frequent. The worst part is that only a small percentage of cases get reported as such. Most cases go unreported or are attributed to anonymous reasons.

The pain suffered by Fathima Lateef, the humanities student at IIT Madras, who left a poignant suicide note as screenshot on her mobile phone before taking the extreme step shakes the conscience of even the unkindest among us. The message identified one of her professors as her tormentor. It is a different matter that a breakthrough in investigations has not happened yet although her parents have been moving heaven and earth to seek justice.

Discrimination against Dalit students is so widespread in our educational system that it has stopped raising an eyebrow. The forms of abuse that these children face are often so stigmatising that they can no longer endure and consequently there has been a steady increase in the number of suicides by Dalit students. 

It has been found that out of 27 cases of suicides that occurred in educational institutions between 2008 and 2016, 23 were Dalits, who suffered discrimination rooted in caste-ridden minds.

The problem of sexual harassment of students by their superiors in institutes of higher learning is so acute that the UGC issued strict regulations in 2015 to prevent such incidents. The regulations recognise the imbalance in the equation between the students and their teachers and administrative staff, which can adversely affect the students’ future by lowering their grades and taking away extra-curricular opportunities from them. This made the students particularly vulnerable to sexual harassment.

The regulations define sexual harassment as ‘unwanted conduct with sexual undertones if it occurs or which is persistent and which demeans, humiliates or creates a hostile and intimidating environment or is calculated to induce submission by actual or threatened adverse consequences’. The unwelcome acts and behaviours could include physical contact and advances, sexually coloured remarks or any objectionable act of a sexual nature ‘whether by way of physical or spoken or unspoken conduct’.

The regulations look good on paper, but their application leaves much to be desired. For instance, each educational institution is supposed to have an internal complaints committee to deal with alleged sexual abuses, but in most cases, the complaints do not reach the committee. Even if they do, things get hushed up there.

One would expect elite institutions such as IITs and medical colleges to be free from this menace, but, unfortunately that is not the case. Some of the most high-profile cases of recent times have taken place in these premium institutions, including those of Lateef and Payal Tadvi, the young Adivasi doctor at Mumbai’s Topiwala National Medical College, who was found hanging in her hostel room due to alleged harassment by her seniors.

Delhi’s All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), one of the country’s premier institutions, has been involved in several such cases. The story of Balmukund Bharti, a final year MBBS student hailing from Kundeshwar village in Madhya Pradesh, who took the extreme step in 2010, had created a nation-wide storm, similar to the one caused by the death of Rohit Vemula, a research scholar at the University of Hyderabad in 2016, although some questioned his Dalit origins.

It was the series of incidents in AIIMS that had forced the Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry to institute a three-member committee headed by SK Thorat, the then UGC chairman, to study the issue. The committee found the existence of various forms of caste-based discrimination against marginalised students both by their classmates and faculties. The UGC regulations were drawn up on the basis of this report.

The scrapping of internal assessment will not ensure complete elimination of discrimination and sexual harassment on the campuses, but it will surely address a major part of the vulnerability of girls and members of depressed classes to those with an evil mind.K Raveendran is a senior journalist. Views are personal.

Students on hunger strike in IIT Guwahati taken to hospital

Students on hunger strike in IIT Guwahati taken to hospital

The PhD students, Vikrant Singh and Himanchal Singh, said they were “forcibly removed” from campus by police officers today. Himanchal said they were told by police that they were attempting suicide, and that was considered an offence.
By
Anjal ..

Read more at:

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/students-on-hunger-strike-in-iit-guwahati-taken-to-hospital/articleshow/73150039.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

IIT-B caves in to Sena man’s push, scraps PUBG from its list - Mumbai Mirror

IIT-B caves in to Sena man’s push, scraps PUBG from its list

Read more at:
https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/other/iit-b-caves-in-to-sena-mans-push-scraps-pubg-from-techfest/articleshow/73092961.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

CBI Begins Investigation In IIT-M Student Fathima Lathief's Suicide Case

CBI Begins Investigation In IIT-M Student Fathima Lathief's Suicide Case

GENERAL NEWS

CBI started its investigation into the death of Fathima Latheef, a student of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras, who committed suicide last month

Written By Sanjeevee Sadagopan | Mumbai | Updated On: December 30, 2019 17:27 IST

Fathima Lathief's father, since the suicide of her daughter in the month of November has been alleging that few of the faculties of IIT-M were responsible for the death of Fathima and was asking for a thorough CBI probe since they were not satisfied with the Investigation of the Central crime branch formed by the Tamilnadu police.

READ: Girl Student Of IIT Madras Ends Life
FIR filed

Abdul Lathief, father of Fathima personally met Tamilnadu chief minister Edapadi Palanisamy, the DGP of the state, Opposition leader MK Stalin during the initial stages of the case, seeking their support to find the reason behind his daughter's death. He also met home minister Amit shah a few weeks back and requested a CBI probe in this matter as the CCB of Tamilnadu police wasn't able to crack the case.

The central crime branch, a team formed by the Tamil Nadu police conducted probe for a month, they also questioned the alleged faculties of the IITM, questioned other students and also the family members of Fathima Lathief, But there was no development in this case for a quite long time and hence the Tamilnadu government referred the case to the CBI.

READ: Plea In HC For CBI Probe Into 14 Suicides In IIT Madras

A CBI team was formed and the probe has been initiated by the team, an FIR is been registered by the CBI as unusual death case, based on the complaint filed by Lalitha Devi, a professor working in IIT-M and the one who is officiating as warden of the particular hostel where the incident took place.

The CCB team has already shared the related evidence and documents to the CBI team and the actual investigation is yet to begin soon with the questioning of Fathima's father Abdul Lathief.