I have a Solution that will reduce pressure on IIT aspirants but do not know how to get this across to HRD Minister of India. Suggestions are welcome. - Ram Krishnaswamy

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Union HRD Minster Smriti Irani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Union HRD Minster Smriti Irani. Show all posts

Friday, May 20, 2016

IITs to release 50 years’ solved JEE question papers to combat Kota coaching - Live Mint

Last Modified: Thu, May 19 2016. 08 06 AM IST


IITs, HRD ministry have also decided to prepare questions for JEE exams keeping in mind the Class 12 syllabus to reduce the difficulty level

Prashant K Nanda

A file photo of IIT Kharagpur. Photo: Indranil Bhoumik/Mint

The central government and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) have jointly decided to release solved question papers of all joint entrance examinations (JEE) held in the last 50 years, Union human resources development (HRD) minister Smriti Irani said. The move is aimed at helping students and reducing the influence of the coaching industry.

The papers will be released through an app and a portal.
The IIT-JEE has long been India’s most iconic and also its most difficult entrance examination.

The IITs and the HRD ministry have also decided to prepare questions for JEE exams keeping in mind the Class XII syllabus to reduce the difficulty level of the JEE, the minister said.
The ministry has also asked IITs to help aspirants with video and audio lectures.

Irani said many people have complained about the menace of the coaching industry. “The question is, what can we do”? The answer, she added, was to provide 50 years of question papers. This will happen in the next two months, Irani said.

The ministry’s move follows a spate of suicides in Kota, a Rajasthan town often called the coaching capital of India. At least half-a-dozen students have committed suicide in Kota this year, the latest one being on 28 April.

India’s coaching industry was worth Rs.40,000 crore in 2011 as per a report by rating agency Crisil. Though its current size is not available, industry insiders peg it in excess of Rs.50,000 crore.

The IITs are India’s most elite engineering schools.
The entrance examination is tough, and requires more than just proficiency with the Class XII syllabus.

That prompts students to take up coaching classes, Irani explained. To address that, “for the first time, the government, in conjunction with the IIT Council, will ensure that the question papers (of JEE) conform to Standard XII syllabus”.

“If degree-level questions are asked, we cannot expect a school student to answer,” the minister added. She said the present system was encouraging students of various school boards to go to places such as Kota “to get that knowledge”.

Irani said that recognizing the language challenge of students in different parts of the country, her ministry has asked the IITs to make all study material available in 13 languages.

In 2012, the IITs for the first time uploaded JEE answer sheets for a “brief period of time” before the final rankings were prepared. In August 2011, the Supreme Court had ruled that examination answer sheets must be made public under the Right to Information Act.

“I don’t think coaching industry is a menace,” said Satya Narayanan R., executive chairman of CL Educate (formerly Career Launcher) which runs a chain of coaching institutes.

“The aim of coaching centres and government is one—to benefit students. Opening up the JEE papers is a good move and shall benefit students. But the question is why students are going for coaching. The answer is, the formal education system has gaps which have not been plugged for decades,” he added.


Saturday, March 5, 2016

JNU row, Rohith Vemula's suicide: Decoding HRD Minister Smriti Irani’s speech in Lok Sabha - ZEE News


Last Updated: Thursday, March 3, 2016 - 21:28

Just before the Budget Session of Parliament, it was reported in the media, though not officially confirmed, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wanted his party colleagues to go all out and be aggressive on the JNU row and the Afzal Guru controversy. And, we saw just that from various BJP lawmakers like Anurag Thakur and Venkaiah Naidu who sought to make the debate into one of nationalism versus anti-nationals.

However, it was the firebrand HRD Minister Smriti Irani who stole the show in Lok Sabha and became the talking point. Her speech was debated in TV studios and became one of the top trends on social media. It also impressed PM Modi so much so that he tweeted a link of the speech and asked people to listen to it.

There is no doubt that for someone who is just a little over a decade old in politics, Irani exudes tremendous amount of confidence and has a ready rejoinder to the barbs thrown at her by her opponents. And that is what was at display in Parliament, especially in Lok Sabha where she sought to turn the tables on the Opposition and hammered home the point that Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi was a political opportunist who, if given a chance, would even align with so-called anti-nationals.

What struck many was the fact that like a good show, the young minister’s speech was laced with both emotion and aggression. Her eyes welled up with tears when talking about the suicide of Dalit scholar Rohith Vemula where she talked about herself being a mother, but the next moment she thundered with anger and challenged anyone to prove that she was guilty of saffronisation of education.

Irani also countered the Opposition charge that she failed in performing her duty and took a dig at Congress, saying that they were taking revenge from her for contesting against Rahul in 2014 General Elections. Perhaps, she went a little overboard with the theatrics and sounded dramatic when she said ‘my name is Smriti Irani and I challenge you to tell my caste’, but in a nutshell there is no doubt that she stood her ground with her oratorical skills and by summoning the right materials and papers.

However, the flip side is that Irani banked on emotions and aggression to circumvent certain matters that the BJP is not very comfortable answering. For example, the minister did not touch upon BJP’s alliance with the PDP in Jammu and Kashmir with the latter’s view not really in sync with the former on Afzal Guru. 

Also, having sort of won the battle in the Lok Sabha, it was a different ball game in the Rajya Sabha for Irani. The Upper House saw huge uproar over her comments on the ‘Mahishasur Martyrdom Day’ being celebrated in JNU with the Opposition accusing the HRD Minister of trying to play communal politics. And BSP chief Mayawati did not let go of the chance to corner Irani by pointing out anomalies in her speech and accusing of BJP of being anti-Dalit.

Not only this, Vemula’s family and friends called the minister's speech in Parliament about the events surrounding the Dalit scholar’s death as a bunch of lies. And her assertions that no doctor was allowed to attend to Vemula for hours and hours, were also refuted by a university physician. To clear the air, Irani needs to tell the nation as to what her facts were based on, otherwise she will be accused of misleading the House.

The HRD Minister is not new to controversies and in the short span that she has occupied the office she has weathered many storms – like the allegations of intervention in IIT appointments and accusations of appointments at various educational bodies of those sympathetic to ‘Hindutava agenda’. She was also attacked by the Opposition for allegedly giving wrong facts about her educational qualifications.

However, every time she gave it back to those criticising her in her own style and it’s likely that Irani may wriggle out of this one too. Yet, she has to be careful because people see through half-truths and lies, if any. But as of now, the HRD Minister to a large extent was successful in fulfilling her party’s agenda of playing on the nationalistic sentiments in the Lok Sabha and emphatically driving home the point to her opponents by stating - “I am not certifying your patriotism, but don’t demean mine. I am not certifying your idea of India, but don’t demean mine.”

First Published: Thursday, March 3, 2016 - 21:27


Tuesday, February 2, 2016

HRD names ex-HC judge for Rohith death probe - Asian Age



A student shouts slogans demanding resignation of Smriti Irani during a protest. (Photo: PTI)

The HRD ministry Thursday named former Allahabad high court judge Ashok Kumar Roopanwal to probe the circumstances that led to dalit scholar Rohith Vemula’s suicide in Hyderabad recently. HRD ministry sources said Justice Roopanwal will review the entire sequence of events and its circumstances and establish facts and correctives. The one-man judicial commission has been asked to submit its report within three months, it is learnt.

Earlier, a fact-finding committee set up by the ministry gave its report on developments at the university, after which it was decided a judicial commission would be set up. The scholar’s death led to protests by students in several parts of the country.
The joint parliamentary committee on SC/ST welfare, chaired by BJP MP Faggan Singh, has voiced concern over Vemula’s suicide and has proposed sending a delegation to the University of Hyderabad, and also to IIT Madras to examine complaints of injustice/discrimination against dalit students.

Vemula’s suicide sparked a political row across India as a written complaint by Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya against the alleged attack on an ABVP activist in August, where he called the university a “den of casteist, extremist and anti-national politics”, led to five letters from the HRD ministry.
Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya, in his letter to the HRD ministry, called the University of Hyderabad a “den of casteist, extremist and anti-national politics” and complained that the ministry had been a “mute spectator” to the attack on the ABVP activist. Both HRD minister Smriti Irani and Mr Dattatreya have been under attack by the Opposition, which has also demanded that both resign.

At the joint parliamentary committee meeting, members also raised strong objections over the absence of the secretaries of the petroleum and telecom departments, and decided to approach Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan to complain about the secretaries allegedly “undermining” parliamentary panels. They also sought her approval for a tour to the University of Hyderabad and IIT Madras, that have been in the news lately over alleged atrocities against dalits.

The agenda of the meeting was to discuss issues related to the implementation of reservations in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd and bodies under the petroleum ministry. But since the secretaries were not available, the panel could not take up the listed agenda.


Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Murder By "Suicide": Institutional Murder Of A Dalit Research Scholar - Counter Currents

By Anand Kumar
25 January, 2016
Socialism.in



The India wide protests that have erupted following the “circumstances” orchestrated by the RSS/BJP right wing which lead to the forced death (SUICIDE) of Rohith Vemula. Rohith a Research Scholar coming from the Dalit SC community was pursuing his doctoral studies at the Hyderabad Central University (HCU). His murder by suicide has once again brought to the surface the ugly face of India’s caste ridden hierarchical society. To make matters worse, we have a ruling party that is steeped in an ideology of hate against minorities and the oppressed castes (particularly the Dalits), promoting Brahmanical bigotry every step of the way.

It is not surprising that the HRD ministry under the aegis of ‘Manu’Smriti Irani and another minister hailing from Hyderabad – Bandaru Dattatreya (with an RSS background) had a direct hand in the suspension of the 5 Dalit research scholars. A confrontation between ABVP (RSS/ BJP student wing) and Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) in August last year was blown out of proportion when the ABVP goon Susheel Kumar made false accusations against the 5 students and used his connections with the BJP at the highest levels to teach Dalit students their place in the University.

More than a mere clash of personal differences, the radical politics of ASA was beginning to ruffle more than a few feathers. Not only was it challenging the traditional left politics espoused by the CPI(M)’s SFI, but were increasingly confronting issues like death penalty, LGBT rights, beef politics, minority rights including those students belonging to Adivasi, Northeastern India, Kashmir etc. With over 500 members from different marginalized backgrounds and beginning to find an echo across the campus (even winning an election in 2011-12), this must have set alarm bells ringing in a very much conservative institution. Incidentally, Rohith Vemula saw himself as a Dalit Marxist and left the SFI precisely for the same reason that Ambedkar had once confronted the Stalinist CPI (M)– caste (Lal Salaam to Jai Bhim: Why Rohith Vemula left Indian Marxists).

Hindutva Revival Department under ‘Manu’Smriti Irani
This is not the first time that the Human Resource Development (HRD) ministry under Smriti Irani has courted controversy. Last year, the Ambedkar – Periyar Study Circle (APSC) was banned at IIT-Madras following an anonymous complaint. Following a social media uproar, this was later revoked. On a more education related issue, the HRD ministry scraped (now reinstated) all fellowships granted to MPhil and PhD students who had not taken the National Eligibility Test (NET). This gave birth to the #OccupyUGC student movement which is very much alive and has linked up with the present protest movement. 

Smirti Irani’s tenure as minister has been anything but controversial. Known more for her roles in the (patriarchal) soap operas than anything concerning education, Irani has gone out of her way to please her RSS bosses.

Worse, Irani’s earlier response in relation to the recent events has only fanned the flames by triggering the resignation of over 10 faculty members from the University. Her assertion such as “not a Dalit vs non Dalit issue”, no blame on any organization/ individual in the suicide letter, following administrative procedure regarding suspension and other defensive arguments are simply packed full of lies. Undue interest was shown by the ministry by sending four letters between September to November to the HCU Vice-Chancellor (VC) regarding the action taken against the students.

The other villain in the plot – Bandaru Dattatreya (MoS for Labour & Employement) is equally responsible for Rohith’s fate. Apart from applying undue pressure on the HRD ministry, his letter to the HRD in August last year labeled ASA and leftist political activities in the campus as ‘casteist, extremist and anti-national’. It has become the habit of the present ruling party to call anyone opposed to the them as anti-national or anti-Hindu. Ironically it is actually the BJP (and the Sangh Parivar) that is in fact the den of extremist, casteist, communal elements that is opposed to all that is progressive or pro-people and has done everything to break the delicate social fabric of the country.
Previous probe findings that had cleared the students was summarily set aside by the newly appointed VC Appa Rao (a BJP appointee and with a past record of discrimination against Dalits) and students were suspended restricting their access to hostel, library, public spaces within campus etc. More crucially their fellowship funds amounting to Rs. 175,000 (in case of Rohith) that were already delayed by 7 months (due to cut backs in social spending in education in the last year budget) was causing them undue financial distress. A Joint Action Committee (JAC) was formed by the student groups and taking a step further Rohith and his fellow comrades decided to protest by sleeping in the open, but the authorities deliberately ignored them.

Rohith’s Story
The short life story of Rohith Vemula, hailing from a Dalit background and raised by single mother, would make anyone cry. The double curse of poverty and still more horrendous experience of being born a Dalit in India can never fully be understand or expressed in words, and yet Rohith overcame all these barriers to securing PhD in a prestigious university under general category, not through the reservation route (which is a major argument used by upper caste elite to further discriminate Dalits students), is no small achievement!

Rohith’s last letter says it all. Even before he took that fatal decision to end his life, we find in his letters not complaints or any display of petty mindedness but a zest for life, wanting to be a science writer like Carl Sagan, echoing one his famous words ‘we are made of star dust ’. The letter stands as a brutal condemnation of the feudal and casteist society that is India, and all that false story build around growth, development etc.

The dignity and magnanimity displayed in the letter should have put the entire ruling political party and its supporters to shame. 

However, all we get to see is their petty mindedness on full display– from shameless characters such as Smriti Irani, Bandaru Dattatreya or BJP party members and the hordes of Sanghi loudmouths online that are casting doubts such as Rohith is not ‘Dalit’ enough, reservation is all to blame, Rohith was indulging in ‘anti-national’ activities, was psychologically depressed and so on. It is this attitude and arrogance of the present government (& supporters) that is filled with bigots and nut-cases that would surely be the cause of its downfall one fine day.

Marking a change in its confrontational attitude, Narendra Modi (PM) finally broke silence after 5 days expressing sadness over Rohith’s death at a student convocation in Lucknow (UP), but was met by students shouting slogans such as ‘Modi Murdabad’, ‘Modi go back’ etc. More specifically he did not say anything about taking actions against all those responsible. But the damage has already been done, BJP has managed to single handedly alienate Dalits, backward castes and youth across the country. This will surely be reflected in the elections to come in the next period especially in UP were Dalit votes matter.

Protest Movement and Beyond
This not the first time a Dalit was forced to take his own life, nine students (from Dalit or backward castes) have taken their lives in the last seven years at HCU alone. There have also been other incidents of Dalit students committing suicide at elite institutions such as IIT’s, AIIMS etc because of caste discrimination. While the previous incidents did not evoke any protests across the country and were mainly confined to the institutions concerned. But this time there have been massive protests in Hyderabad, Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and also in other smaller metros across India.

The difference is the heightened consciousness of many student groups that have been involved in other face offs with the govt. Protests have not been confined to Dalit organizations alone, but many youth from the upper caste background have also shown solidarity.

The other important factor contributing to this is the string of controversies that have been the hallmark of Narendra Modi’s tenure as PM. Apart from his love affair with the corporate elite at the expense of the majority, the governments covert backing of the Hindutva agenda has polarized the country like never before. (See: Is Modimania On The Wane?)

The FTII student protest lasted for about 139 days and the struggle still continues though in other forms. #OccupyUGC movement despite a formal victory, is still continuing with protests for the last 2 months over certain aspects that has not been clarified by the HRD ministry. So it is not far-fetched to expect this protest to last even longer if the core demands of the JAC are not met. Even if this protest is dissipated, the damage has already been done. And next time around, another controversy of this scale could put a question mark on the longevity of this right wing, communal BJP led government.
On the other hand, the BJP is desperately trying to buy its way out such as the ex-gratia payment of Rs. 8 lakh (which has been rejected by the family of the deceased), ordering a judicial commission inquiry and if the worst comes may even drop Smriti Irani and Bandaru Dattatreya or take action against some low hanging fruits like the VC or Susheel Kumar. Unless legally compelled or via mass pressure to act on the JAC’s core demands, the central govt is unlikely to go beyond mere tokenism. How this will play out depends on several factors and crucially on how sensitively/ insensitively this govt handles the situation.

The present situation in India can best be described as radicalization of different sections of the Indian youth and working people on the one hand and communal polarization going hand in hand. Failure to meet expectations and lurching from one major controversy after another, Narendra Modi govt. could unwittingly end up causing a mass upheaval in the country. But it is the leadership of the left forces that is really wanting to take advantage of that enormous class anger to challenge the communal, casteist and capitalist forces that are presently holding the reigns of administration.

Hence, there is a crying need to build a genuinely left, viable mass alternative to challenge the present Capitalist, Communal & Casteist regime and pave way for a Socialist Alternative as urgently as possible.

Anand Kumar is activist a member of New Socialist Alternative and incharge of the Website Socialism.in


Probe into Rohith Vermula’s suicide will suggest ways to fight bias too: HRD - Indian Express


That apart, the ministry also promised to set up a cell in its office to receive complaints from such students and take quick action on their grievances.


By: Express News Service | New Delhi | 
Published:January 23, 2016 2:44 am

At Wednesday’s press meet, Smriti Irani was flanked by ministers Vijay Sanpla, Thaawar Chand Gehlot and Nirmala Sitharaman, but not by her Ministers of State.

Two days after the government dismissed the caste angle to the Dalit student’s suicide at Hyderabad Central University, the HRD Ministry went into damage-control mode and announced a judicial commission to look into circumstances that led to Rohith Vemula’s death.

The commission will also consider a host of measures to reach out to “socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged students”, including a sensitisation programme on campus discrimination for staff and heads of all centrally funded educational institutions.

This development came against the backdrop of the report submitted by the fact-finding committee to HRD Minister Smriti Irani on Friday on Vemula’s suicide. The minister also spoke to Vemula’s mother and brother in the morning to offer her condolences.

Although the contents of the report were not made public, it is learnt that the committee, apart from listing facts and sequence of events, has observed that the university could have handled the matter more sensitively. The panel, however, has refrained from finding fault with the university’s vice-chancellor Prof Appa Rao Podile.

The committee is said to have also pointed out that the student’s suicide was not an isolated incident and that the university has had problems before and needs systemic reforms to build a conducive environment for all students. The fact-finding panel recorded the deposition of 71 people.

Although the report doesn’t fix responsibility for Vemula’s death, the government is reportedly unhappy with Rao for “mishandling the situation on campus” and moving out of the university to an undisclosed location instead of reaching out to the students after the news of Vemula’s suicide surfaced on Sunday evening.

“Even the report shows that the situation could have been brought under control by the administration. The Centre has been forced to fire fight on his behalf,” said a government source.

Sources indicate that Rao could be informally asked to tender his resignation on moral grounds if the campus unrest continues.

The HRD Ministry will write to the Registrar of the Telangana High Court this week for a panel of three names to constitute the judicial commission announced on Friday. It will be headed by either a retired judge or chief justice of a High Court, sources said. The report will be submitted in three months.

To address the issue of discrimination on campus, the government will issue a special charter to all centrally funded institutions. These universities and institutions will also have to run a mandatory orientation programme to sensitise all “academic administrators about understanding and handling problems faced by socially, educationally and economically disadvantaged students.” A module will be prepared for this orientation.

That apart, the ministry also promised to set up a cell in its office to receive complaints from such students and take quick action on their grievances.

“All VCs and senior administrators would be sensitised to reach out to socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged students. There should be zero tolerance for any acts of discrimination on campus,” the ministry’s press release states.
“The Peer-group Assisted Learning (PAL) of IIT Gandhinagar would be extended to all the HEIs, under which mentors would be arranged for the socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged students not only to assist them in education, but to support them with regards to challenges being faced by them within their institutions,” the press statement added.

- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/probe-into-rohith-vermulas-suicide-will-suggest-ways-to-fight-bias-too-hrd/#sthash.feAjmGP3.dpuf

Rohith’s suicide: Kejriwal wants Smriti’s name in FIR - The Hindu

HYDERABAD, January 22, 2016

CPI General secretary D. Raja and other leaders paying tribute to Rohith Vemula by garlanding a memorial stupa at UoH in Hyderabad on Thursday.— Photo: G. Ramakrishna

CPI demands Prime Minister Narendra Modi to break his silence over the issue

The fourth day, after research scholar of University of Hyderabad (UoH), Rohith Vemula, committed suicide, saw senior leaders of anti-BJP political parties stepping up the pressure in a bid to make the Centre bow down to its demands and break the impasse.

Those who visited the campus include Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, senior leaders of the Communist Party of India Suravaram Sudhakar Reddy and D. Raja and Lok Satta Party founder Jayaprakash Narayan. They wanted Union Ministers Smriti Irani and B. Dattatreya to be removed from their positions, as also the Vice-Chancellor, P. Appa Rao.

Mr. Arvind Kejriwal demanded that the name of Union HRD Minister Smriti Irani be included in the First Information Report (FIR) on the suicide of Dalit research scholar Rohith Vemula. He wanted the arrest of Ms. Smriti Irani and others whose names figure in the FIR, including Mr. Dattatreya, MLC N. Ramchandra Rao and ABVP leader N. Susheel Kumar.
Mr. Kejriwal pointed out that they should be arrested because the sections in the FIR were non-bailable.

‘Smriti Irani playing politics’
“And because Ms. Irani is lying and is playing politics, she should apologise to the nation too,” he said, demanding a full-fletched probe in to the incident. “Call data records of the mobile numbers of all concerned should be looked into,” he added.

On their part, CPI leaders including general secretary Suravaram Sudhakar Reddy, national secretary D. Raja and former MP Azeez Pasha demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi break his silence and order a probe into the developments that have rocked the UoH in the recent weeks and months.
“Mr. Modi found time to convey his condolences to Peshawar on Wednesday, but as far as UoH is concerned, he has not even had the leisure to do the same. He should take action on his colleagues who abetted the suicide,” Mr. Sudhakar Reddy said.

“IITs and Central universities are public-funded with allocations from the Government of India and have to be responsible. The rule of reservation has to be strictly followed and no discrimination of any sort, leave alone on the basis of caste and social status, be allowed. The field of education has become a battlefield of ideas of socialism, secularism and Hindutva,” Mr. Raja said, expressing his outrage.

Police have been present in full force since Thursday morning to prevent embarrassing moments and had a watchful eye over those from ABVP on campus and in the immediate vicinity of the UoH campus.

Interestingly, there is a dichotomy of sorts with students divided on how far they should enlist the support of anti-BJP political parties in their ‘struggle for justice against the social boycott’.


Dalit suicide case: HRD ministry to set up judicial panel - Business World

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

January 22, 2016 Last Updated at 16:42 IS

Based on the report by a fact-finding team, the HRD Ministry today decided to set up a Judicial Commission to look into the sequence of events leading to the suicide of Rohith Vemula, a Dalit scholar at the Hyderabad Central University.

The Judicial Commission will submit its report within three months, a Human Resource Development Ministry statement said.

It said in order to prevent such incidents future, all VCs and senior administrators would be sensitised to reach out to students and there will be "zero tolerance" for any acts of discrimination on campus.

"The fact finding committee constituted by HRD Ministry in the wake of the chain of unfortunate events at the Central University Hyderabad submitted its report to the Ministry on January 22, 2016.

"Based on its observations and findings, the Ministry has decided to constitute a Judicial Commission to review the entire sequence of events and the circumstances and to establish the facts and correctives in the context of the University," the statement said.

Rohith's body was found hanging in the varsity's hostel room on Sunday, which sparked massive protests across the country.

While Rohith in his letter expressed disillusionment with life, the suicide has snowballed into a major political storm with parties demanding the ouster of Union Minister Bandaru Dattatreya and HRD Minister Smriti Irani.

The Hyderabad University had suspended Rohith and four other students after they allegedly assaulted an ABVP leader. The suspension came after Dattatreya shot off a letter to the HRD ministry in August last year, asking it to look into the matter. Students have alleged that his suspension led to Rohith's depression and his eventual suicide.

Meanwhile, HRD Minister Smriti Irani also spoke to Vemula's mother today and expressed her condolences.

In order to address the issues faced by the students from disadvantaged social economic and education background in higher educational institutions "comprehensively" and to prevent such unfortunate incidents in future, the Ministry has also chalked out a series of measures.

The Ministry has decided to set up a special mechanism for receiving and taking expeditious action on the grievances from these students.

At the same time, all VCs and senior administrators would be sensitised to reach out to such students and there will be "zero tolerance" for any acts of discrimination on campus. "A special charter will be issued to all the higher educational institutions in this regard," the statement said.

The Ministry said that Peer group assisted Learning (PAL) of IIT Gandhinagar would be extended to all the HEIs.

Under this, mentors would be arranged for the socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged students not only to assist them in education but to support them to face challenges.

All We Know About Rohith Vermula’s Suspension and Suicide - ScoopWhoop

Jan 21, 2016 at 15:37
All We Know About Rohith Vermula’s Suspension and Suicide
by


Rohith Vermula, 26, a second year PhD scholar, committed suicide on Sunday night at a hostel of Hyderabad Central University. He was among the five research scholars at the university who were suspended in December over allegations of disputes with students


A student staging a protest in Nagpur / PTI

Why was he suspended?
  • The university students – belonging to various students groups like right-wing Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Ambedkar Students’ Association (ASA) (of which Vermula was a member) and Telangana SFI - had been fighting over several issues such as beef festival, memorial for Yakub Menon and Kiss of Love campaign. Apparently, ABVP had been opposing these.
  • The latest trigger was in August when ASA tried to screen Nakul Shawney’s documentary titled Muzaffarnagar Abhi Baki Hai at the campus, which was opposed by ABVP, who disrupted the screening and called it “anti-Hindu”. The Ambedkar Reading Group, University of Delhi, Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle, IIT Madras, ASA (TISS) in Mumbai and concerned students from IIT Bombay even issued a joint statement condemning the act.
  • But it became violent when ABVP president Sushil Kumar put up a Facebook post calling ASA members ‘goons’. Kumar later alleged that he was beaten up by ASA members including Vermula.
  • After the incident, the Hyderabad University administration stopped paying Rohith his monthly stipend of Rs 25,000.
  • On August 5, two days after Rohith and four other ASA members allegedly assaulted Sushil Kumar, the university set up an inquiry against the five.
  • On August 17, BJP MP and Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya wrote to HRD Minister Smriti Irani urging action saying the university had become “a den of casteist, extremist and anti-national politics”.
“This could be visualised from the fact that when Yakub Memon was hanged, a dominant students union, that is Ambedkar Students Union had held protests against the execution. When Shushil Kumar, president, ABVP, protested against this, he was manhandled and as a result he was admitted in hospital. What is more tragic is that the university administration has become a mute spectator to such events,” Bandaru wrote.
  • In December, after the then VC's retirement, new chancellor - Appa Rao - was appointed. He suspended the students after receiving a letter from the HRD ministry, which was in response to Bandaru's letter.
  • On January 3, the five students vacated the hostel and set up a tent in the campus and began a "relay hunger strike" 
  • The five students were apparently very depressed about the suspension.
After the suicide
  • The suicide led to a protest in the university, with the students demanding that Vermula, a Dalit, was driven to suicide and demanded resignations of Union ministers Smriti Irani and Bandaru Dattatreya on Tuesday
  • Following the protest, the police filed an FIR against Bandaru Dattatreya, under the SC/ST Act and on charges that he abetted the suicide
  • The university students’ Joint Action Committee termed the suicide as “institutional murder” while opposition parties criticised the BJP-led NDA government for having an “anti-Dalit agenda and mindset”.
Police use water cannons to disperse protesting students in Delhi / PTI
  • An umbrella organisation of the Hyderabad University launched an indefinite strike and sought the resignation of vice chancellor Appa Rao
  • Protests erupted even in Delhi, where students demonstrated in front of HRD ministry office in Shastri Bhawan on Tuesday. The police used water cannons to disperse the students. Similar protests took place at Pune's Film and Television Institute of India and Mumbai University
  • Noted writer Ashok Vajpeyi announced he was returning the D Lit, awarded to him by the Hyderabad Central University in protest.
  • The police also recovered a suicide note from Rohith that said, "I feel a growing gap between my soul and my body. And I have become a monster."


Feature image: PTI

Hyderabad suicide shows why Smriti Irani is India's Joan of Farce: She can only war, not peace - First Post

by Sandipan Sharma  Jan 21, 2016 16:29 IST

When a fire is burning in the backyard, a wise, patient head of the family is expected to bring down the temperature by pouring cold water over it.

But, trust Smriti Irani to first pour gallons of ghee over it and then light a matchstick.

Smriti Irani in a file photo. PTI

On Wednesday, when it seemed the fire that has engulfed the Hyderabad University campus was stabilising, if not abating, in came the HRD Minister firing on all cylinders against the "malicious attempt" to turn it into a caste issue.

The result: Now even the Dalit professors are enraged. To express solidarity with the students and to protest Irani's "fabricated" statement, ten of them have quit their administrative positions.

In an emotionally charged atmosphere, Irani should have ideally made an attempt to reach out to the students, listen to them patiently, assuage their feelings and address their concerns. At the very least, she could have made an attempt to visit the university, just as she rushes to Amethi at the slightest provocation, instead of fiddling with facts in her Delhi AC room while the campus was burning.

Now, Irani has turned it into an Us vs Them battle, not realising that in this war there is no Them for a minister-in-charge of the country's education system. It is all her parivar, even if not all of it is saffron.

The fire that she has stoked in Hyderabad with her attempt to blame the opposition for what is essentially a crisis triggered by her own ministry and BJP stooges on the campus, is classic Smriti Irani.

Picking up fights in public, getting into ego clashes and rushing headlong into battles where even angels fear to tread has been a hallmark of her politics. Flared nostrils, furrowed brow, flaming eyes and frequent calls to arms have become trademarks of her public persona. Fight, even when flight is the better option, has become her mechanical response to every crisis, making her India's Joan of Farce meets Don Corleone.
No fight is too low for the country's HRD minister, she competes in all categories, punches both above and below her weight.
Just a few days ago, when Economic Times wrote about the sifarish raj in Kendriya Vidyalayas under her ministry, an indignant Irani rushed to Twitter to pick up a catfight with the reporter. In her place, any other minister would have either ignored the report or asked a junior mandarin to write to the editor. But, perhaps, such restraint and discretion would have been an affront to the bellicose bahu image of the minister.
Before this, Irani took on renowned nuclear scientist and IIT Mumbai chairperson Anil Kakodkar, forcing him to quit from the board of directors of the premier institutions. Kakodkar's resignation came two months after IIT Delhi director R Shevgaonkar had stepped down from his post in December 2014 because of reported differences between him and the ministry over certain issues.

And, then, there is the mother of all battles she had picked up with her current mentor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, when, she had sat on a dharna demanding the Gujarat chief minister's resignation in the aftermath of the Gujarat riots.

Chronicling her descent from Queen-bee to Queen-been, in a cover story in May, the Outlook magazine had pointed out that Irani had become a liability for the party and may be soon cut down to size.

'The basic problem, say sources in the BJP, is this. She has overplayed her hand in trying to position herself as someone who is close to and favoured by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Simultaneou­sly, she has also thrown her weight around in the party, with even colleagues in the gover­nment, as also bureaucrats. Com­plaints of rudeness, arrogance and temper have been carried to Shah, every inch Modi’s man,' the magazine wrote in a damning indictment of her style, temper and temperament.

While legends of controversies and catfights abound, there isn't much on the credit side in the minister's ledger book. Except for ramming through decisions like making Sanskrit compulsory in schools, withdrawing the non-Net fellowship to research scholars, the HRD ministry can't claim a single decision that has contributed to the betterment of the education system. She has, instead, been slammed for packing the varsities with pliant VCs — like the one in Hyderabad — and giving weightage to Hindutva crusaders like Dinanath Batra over academicians and scholars of repute.

In a brutal criticism of her ministry, SN Balagangadhara and Jakob De Roover, two professors teaching in Ghent University, Belgium, had recently called her a terrible choice for the ministry. "When you have a third-rate Sanskrit pundit as your advisor on higher education policy, why would you need to study the sociology, history, philosophy and psychology of science to find out the problems involved in generating and encouraging scientific creativity? Your Sanskrit pundit will hunt out the relevant Vedic shlokas, whereas Europeans and Americans can do empirical research into science," the scholars had argued, lamenting that her tenure was a tragedy of gigantic proportions.

Tomes can fill up legends of Irani's fall. Even encyclopedias will be too small for accommodating the words of her critics. Seeing her stumble from one controversy to another, one flame to another flagration, many like Madhu Kishwar would ask, didn't we tell you so?

"Here is someone who is not just poorly educated and mal-educated – she is just Class 12th pass –  lied in her affidavit about her qualifications. Nor does she have the learning of a lived experience. Look at the trajectory of this woman – at 18, she leaves home for the glamour industry, to become a fashion model, a beauty queen, then gets into saas-bahu serials, which, even by the standards of the entertainment industry, is the lowest genre. It is brainless. She could not even qualify to head the National School of Drama," Kishwar had ranted in her interview with Scroll.in.

The tragic truth is, Irani has proved her critics right. Instead of obliterating the image skeptics had of her, she has converted every opportunity into a crisis, reinforcing the persona of an inexperienced, haughty and pugnacious politician who can't digest the success handed to her on a platter.

Irani has several steller qualities. She is fiery, confident and brave. Pitting her against political rivals like Rahul Gandhi, utilising her oratorical skills and experience of the theatre in parliament and TV studios could have turned her into an asset for the BJP.

Alas, they chose her for a job that requires erudition, patience, humility and the prescience to know that for a real guru, vasudhaiva (the earth) is a kutumbakam (family), not a perennial battleground.


Dalit scholar death: Student leaders trash Irani’s statement - Financial Express

HomeIndia-news Dalit scholar death: Student leaders trash Irani’s statement
Dalit scholar death: Student leaders trash Irani’s statement

Union HRD Minister Smriti Irani has made a "wrong statement" regarding the protests in Hyderabad Central University over the alleged suicide of a Dalit scholar and the ongoing row in the institution, student leaders spearheading the agitation claimed here today.

By: PTI | Hyderabad | January 20, 2016 11:34 PM


The students held consultations after Irani addressed a press conference in New Delhi. (PTI)

Union HRD Minister Smriti Irani has made a “wrong statement” regarding the protests in Hyderabad Central University over the alleged suicide of a Dalit scholar and the ongoing row in the institution, student leaders spearheading the agitation claimed here today.

“We would like refute each and every point,” a leader of the agitating students said.

The students held consultations after Irani addressed a press conference in New Delhi.

He said the Dalit and student movements have come together in the university following the alleged suicide of Vemula Rohith Chakravarthi.

The minister mentioned that an executive council in the university had Dalit representatives but the body only had a co-opted SC member, he said.

On Irani’s statement that a Congress leader (MP Hanumantha Rao) had also written on issues concerning the university, he said the minister should direct the university to implement the SC and ST sub-plan.

The minister stated that the suicide note of Rohit was the only document made available to her but the deceased had written to the Vice Chancellor earlier, he said.

The issues should not be made a BJP versus Congress issue as it is an issue of Rohit’s alleged suicide and human rights, according to him.

The minister described the punishment given to the student as “lenient” but “social boycott” and “institutional murder” cannot be “lenient”, the student leader said.

The students demanded the arrest of all those figuring in the FIR including Vice Chancellor Appa Rao Podile.

The protesting students also burnt an effigy of the minister inside the campus.

Hyderabad Lok Sabha member and MIM president Asaduddin Owaisi, while speaking before the protesting students tonight, said Irani should have visited the varsity.

“We were expecting the minister would say ‘I am coming to Hyderabad. I want to meet Rohit’s mother. I want to meet those boys who are sitting on strike for the last 15-16 days. I want to hear first-hand from them.’ This would have been a right step in the right direction. Instead (she was) exonerating everyone, giving a clean chit to the Vice Chancellor who is equally responsible for what happened to Rohit,” said Owaisi, who had addressed the students yesterday too.

Alleging that BJP was opposed to egalitarian idea of India, he said such attempts should be foiled.


First Published on January 20, 2016 11:34 pm

Rohith Vemula suicide: Irani puts up a spirited defence, but it's a bit too late - First Post



by Sanjay Singh  Jan 21, 2016 07:26 IST

Given the enormity of the circumstances leading to the tragic death of Rohit Vemula, a research scholar in a central university and the extraordinary events subsequent to his suicide, it was not completely surprising to see the Union Minister for Human Resource Development holding a press conference on Wednesday. This has been the biggest media headline for the past three days and has somehow snowballed into a politically sensitive -- Dalit versus non-Dalit issue. Add to this, all of BJP's political rivals—Congress, Left, AAP and TMC—have flocked together to launch a concerted attack on the party holding it responsible for the sad incident.


Union HRD Minister Smriti Irani. PTI

HRD Minister Smriti Irani's brief was clear. She was assigned the task of telling the world that it is not a Dalit versus non-Dalit issue as some quarters are desperately trying to project it as. Irani therefore repeatedly urged that there is no Dalit versus non-Dalit angle in the whole incident. "Why I have come out today is because a malicious attempt is being made to ignite passions.... It is easy to ignite passions and then regret at leisure. My attempt is an appeal that this is not a Dalit versus non-Dalit issue. Let us not encourage any rumour mongering that promotes casteism and provokes communities. I request let us be extremely responsible..."

Significantly, it is not the high-profile political tourism over Vemula's death that has turned Hyderabad into a tinderbox now, but the elections for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation that are to take place on 2 February. While the national parties and the likes of AAP, TMC and Left have made their position clear, the views of the two regional parties, whose opinions perhaps would have mattered most—the TRS and the TDP—are not known to the wider world. Or perhaps no one, outside of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana cares about what they have to say, for Vemula's unfortunate death has become a national issue.

The government's decision to pitch Irani, known for her aggressive articulation, thus has been largely strategic. As HRD minister, the issue concerns her ministerial domain, but she took four days to come out and make the government's position known on the subject. Smriti's defence for the delay was that she was ascertaining facts and since she held a responsible constitutional position, she couldn't have spoken without adequate information, officially made available to her. A ministerial fact-finding team had been sent to the University of Hyderabad to get details from the institution and the local police. She however, held her media briefing hours before the fact finding team was to submit its report to her.

ALSO SEE

The key questions that agitated everyone's mind when she held that briefing was whether Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Labour Bandaru Dattatreya was right in writing to her that the University of Hyderabad had become a den of casteist, extremist and anti-national politics. The labour minister also sought action against Ambedkar Students Association activists and alleged that the university administration had become "mute spectators". The second question was if Irani's ministry was pressurising the University of Hyderabad by sending five reminders while seeking response on Dattatreya letter. An FIR has been filed against Dattatreya and the institution's vice chancellor Appa Rao Podile.

Smriti, one must admit, had come prepared with facts and perspective. She referred to a letter written by Congress' Rajya Sabha MP Hanumantha Rao on 17 November pertaining to sufferings of marginalised community members from the Telangana region in the university. According to an official circular on Central Secretariat Manual of Office Procedure issued by V Narayansamy, the then minister of personnel in the UPA government, if there is a VIP (MP) reference, it has to be acknowledged in 15 days and another 15 days may be taken to reply to it. Since no response was forthcoming from the university, the ministry had to send reminders. As per the procedure the ministry kept sending reminders to the university from September till late November. The university finally responded in the first week of January. Smriti said by sending reminders the ministry was not doing any special favours to Dattatreya or acting under his pressure but was simply following the procedure because the ministry had sent six reminders to university on Hanumatha Rao's letter.

While defending the government she also referred to the High Court, the executive council nominated by the UPA government, disciplinary committee, hostel warden while emphasizing that some of these officials were from the Dalit community. But what the HRD minister didn't seem to realise is that she took too much of time in ascertaining her facts. The issue has gone beyond the realm of administrative matter. It has become a social, political and a perception issue against her government and her party -- the BJP.

Friday, August 7, 2015

757 dropouts from IITs, 717 from NITs in 2014-15: Minister


Contributed by JAKE CARTER on August 5, 2015 at 11:43 pm


“The reasons for dropouts may be attributed to shifting to other colleges/institutions, personal reasons, medical reasons, getting jobs during PG courses, inability to cope with academic stress etc”, Irani said in a written reply.



In some IITs, students who have more than three to four backlogs during the first two semesters, find it hard to pursue the remaining course and this might lead to dropouts, said S Sundar, chairman of IIT-JEE. IIT Roorkee saw the most dropouts at 228, followed by IIT Kharagpur, 209, and IIT Delhi, 169.

Though the number of IIT dropouts is growing every year, the IITs had preferred to opt for an “exit policy” aimed at plugging seat vacancies that occur when students quietly drop out, instead of taking concrete steps to stop the dropouts.

There are 16 IITs and 30 NITs in the country.

Of the NITs, there were 717 dropouts in 2014-15, lower than 785 found in the year-prior period.

In a major relief to students, IITs and NITs will refund the acceptance fee after deducting minimal processing charges in case a student gives up his allotted seat to take admission in any other institute including private one. The administration is resolved to deliver issues identified with academic stress, she included.

She said that the IITs had initiated continuous corrective actions to minimise dropouts, including counselling to de-stress students, guidance and counselling unit headed by faculty members and appointments of advisors. It lives up to expectations almost alongside various staff advocates and consultants to “recognise students confronting emotional challenges and aide them to expert guides for help”.

Referring to the member, the Minister said his indication that “children in the IIT ecosystem and IIT family are committing suicides because they are unable to keep up with the pressure that the academic environment in the IIT has, is incorrect”.
Irani told the House in response to a question that IITs have extensive support systems to help students overcome barriers such as language and their progress was monitored on a monthly basis.

The issue came to light after the IIT-Roorkee recently expelled 73 students for their under-performance and later took them back to give another chance for improving their performance amid an uproar in the political circles as most of these students belonged to the reserved categories. AIADMK member M Thambidurai, while asking a supplementary question in the Lok Sabha, drew a comparison of figures and sought to know from the HRD minister why the students were moving out from “reputed institutes” like IIT Roorkee, Mumbai and Delhi in high numbers but not from similar institutions like IIT Madras.

Smriti Irani concedes academic stress leading to drop-outs in IITs, NITs; rejects notion it's causing suicides - dna


Thursday, 6 August 2015 - 8:34am IST |
 Place: New Delhi | Agency: PTI



Interestingly, while responding to a supplementary query on whether academic pressure is causing suicide by IIT students, Irani asserted this was "incorrect"

Over 4,400 students dropped out of IITs and NITs in the last three years due to various reasons including "academic stress", the government said on Wednesday and assured that corrective actions have been initiated.

As many as 2,060 students dropped out from various Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) from 2012-13 to 2014-15, Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani informed the Lok Sabha during Question Hour.

During this three-year period, 2,352 students dropped out from the National Institutes of Technology (NITs).

"The reasons for dropouts may be attributed to shifting to other colleges/institutions, personal reasons, medical reasons, getting jobs during PG courses, inability to cope with academic stress etc," Irani said in a written reply. In 2014-15, IITs witnessed 757 dropouts which was higher than 697 dropouts (2013-14) and 606 (2012-13). During this period, IIT Roorkee saw the highest number of dropouts at 228, followed by IIT Kharagpur (209) and IIT Delhi (169).

Interestingly, there were no dropouts at IITs in Mandi, Jodhpur, Kanpur, Madras and Ropar during 2014-15 period. There are 16 IITs and 30 NITs in the country. Of the NITs, there were 717 dropouts in 2014-15, lower than 785 seen in the year-ago period. In 2012-13, the dropout numbers stood at 850.

Irani said there is a mechanism for helping students who are under stress. The government is committed to address issues related to academic stress, she added. Listing out various initiatives that are in place to minimise dropouts at IITs, Irani said there is a guidance and counselling unit, headed by a faculty member. It works closely along with a number of faculty counsellors and advisors to "identify students facing emotional difficulties and guide them to professional counsellors for help". 

Interestingly, while responding to a supplementary query on whether academic pressure is causing suicide by IIT students, Irani asserted this was "incorrect". Referring to the member, the Minister said his indication that "children in the IIT ecosystem and IIT family are committing suicides because they are unable to keep up with the pressure that the academic environment in the IIT has, is incorrect". 

Irani also assured that any challenge that IIT students present to the faculty within the IIT ecosystem would be met in a supportive fashion.

To another query, she said, "I had said that I contest the fact that there is no mechanism available within the IITs to address issues with regard to either academic stress" or that more problems are faced by children from weaker segments of society. "I would like to firmly state here with all humility that to say that students do not take stress is not a statement that I made. I said that we have provided a mechanism that a student under stress within this eco system can approach and seek help and guidance from," Irani noted.

She was responding to AIADMK member M Thambidurai, also the Deputy Speaker, who asked the Minister about the anomaly in the written and oral responses. To a query about IIT Roorkee expelling 73 students last month for less academic scores, Irani said the IIT's action was challenged in court. The court had upheld IITs' right to ensure that academic performance, that the students themselves gave an undertaking to uphold, was met.

"IIT, Roorkee undertook an initiative to take these students back only if they yet again fulfill those academic standards that they gave an undertaking when they entered into the system," she noted.

AIADMK member P Sundaram asked her about the issue at IIT, Chennai where students were apparently prevented from enriching their knowledge through forums like Periyar-Ambedkar Study Circle. In response, Irani said in the case of IIT Chennai, it is the institution, the Academic Executive Council and the Students Council which has elected representatives of student bodies within the institution, that set benchmarks for activities undertaken by any individual within that campus.

Over 4,400 students dropout of IITs, NITs in three years - Deccan Herald

New Delhi, Aug 5, 2015, (PTI)


Over 4,400 students dropped out of IITs and NITs in the last three years due to various reasons including "academic stress", the government said today and assured that corrective actions have been initiated.

As many as 2,060 students dropped out from various Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) from 2012-13 to 2014-15, Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani informed the Lok Sabha during Question Hour.

During this three-year period, 2,352 students dropped out from the National Institutes of Technology (NITs).

"The reasons for dropouts may be attributed to shifting to other colleges/institutions, personal reasons, medical reasons, getting jobs during PG courses, inability to cope with academic stress etc," Irani said in a written reply.

In 2014-15, IITs witnessed 757 dropouts which was higher than 697 dropouts (2013-14) and 606 (2012-13). During this period, IIT Roorkee saw the highest number of dropouts at 228, followed by IIT Kharagpur (209) and IIT Delhi (169).

Interestingly, there were no dropouts at IITs in Mandi, Jodhpur, Kanpur, Madras and Ropar during 2014-15 period.

There are 16 IITs and 30 NITs in the country.

Of the NITs, there were 717 dropouts in 2014-15, lower than 785 seen in the year-ago period. In 2012-13, the dropout numbers stood at 850.

Irani said there is a mechanism for helping students who are under stress. The government is committed to address issues related to academic stress, she added.

Listing out various initiatives that are in place to minimise dropouts at IITs, Irani said there is a guidance and counselling unit, headed by a faculty member. It works closely along with a number of faculty counsellors and advisors to "identify students facing emotional difficulties and guide them to professional counsellors for help".

Interestingly, while responding to a supplementary query on whether academic pressure is causing suicide by IIT students, Irani asserted this was "incorrect".

Referring to the member, the Minister said his indication that "children in the IIT ecosystem and IIT family are committing suicides because they are unable to keep up with the pressure that the academic environment in the IIT has, is incorrect".

Irani also assured that any challenge that IIT students present to the faculty within the IIT ecosystem would be met in a supportive fashion.

To another query, she said, "I had said that I contest the fact that there is no mechanism available within the IITs to address issues with regard to either academic stress" or that more problems are faced by children from weaker segments of society.

"I would like to firmly state here with all humility that to say that students do not take stress is not a statement that I made. I said that we have provided a mechanism that a student under stress within this eco system can approach and seek help and guidance from," Irani noted.

She was responding to AIADMK member M Thambidurai, also the Deputy Speaker, who asked the Minister about the anomaly in the written and oral responses.

To a query about IIT Roorkee expelling 73 students last month for less academic scores, Irani said the IIT's action was challenged in court. The court had upheld IITs' right to ensure that academic performance, that the students themselves gave an undertaking to uphold, was met.

"IIT, Roorkee undertook an initiative to take these students back only if they yet again fulfill those academic standards that they gave an undertaking when they entered into the system," she noted.

AIADMK member P Sundaram asked her about the issue at IIT, Chennai where students were apparently prevented from enriching their knowledge through forums like Periyar-Ambedkar Study Circle.

In response, Irani said in the case of IIT Chennai, it is the institution, the Academic Executive Council and the Students Council which has elected representatives of student bodies within the institution, that set benchmarks for activities undertaken by any individual within that campus.  

Monday, June 8, 2015

IIT-Madras Lifts Ban on Ambedkar Periyar Students' Group - NDTV

All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: June 07, 2015 21:15 IST

CHENNAI:  Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (IIT-M) today reinstated recognition of a student group, whose de-recogition had triggered a controversy, and appointed a professor as its faculty advisor, bringing an end to the more than a week-long standoff.

The re-instatement of recognition to Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle (APSC) and appointment of Professor Miland Brahme as Advisor came after a meeting between the Dean of Students and representatives of APSC held today, ending the confrontation that had left the campus in turmoil.

"The Dean of Students reinstated the recognition of APSC as an independent student body, and after consultation with the APSC representatives, recommended Professor Milind Brahme as the Faculty Advisor," an official release from IIT-M said.


RELATED
"Professor Brahme has consented to advise APSC as required in the guidelines for independent student bodies," it said.

IIT-M found itself at the centre of a controversy after it recently derecognised APSC, many of whose members are Dalits, following a complaint that it was critical of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Union HRD Minster Smriti Irani also came under fire from political parties including the Congress and students' bodies for the action against the APSC.

IIT-M had, however, maintained that "as per the guidelines in force, student bodies cannot use its name or its official entities in any capacity to publicise their activities or garner support without official permission."

With students staging protests demanding withdrawal of the action, IIT-M had last week convened a meeting of the Board of Students.

Noting that the Board of Students met and discussed the issues raised by APSC regarding modifications and suggestions for ensuring uniform guidelines for independent student bodies, the release said, some of the suggestions will be taken up in "due course".

"Some of these will be implemented by the Office of Dean (Students), while the Student Affairs Council, Board of Students, and Senate will take up the modifications in due course for consideration as per established procedure," it said.

APSC and Dean of Students expressed satisfaction that the matter "has been closed", the release said.

Story First Published: June 07, 2015 20:13 IST