I have a Solution that will reduce pressure on IIT aspirants but do not know how to get this across to HRD Minister of India. Suggestions are welcome. - Ram Krishnaswamy

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). Show all posts

Thursday, July 11, 2019

Assembly Line - Telegraph India

Assembly Line

Much is said about Kota, the coaching hub. But what’s it like to be a student there...

By Manasi Shah

Published 9.07.19, 4:53 PM


A still from the Web-series Kota Factory, which portrays students’ lives in the city(Screengrab)

Every year, lakhs of students go to Kota, a city in Rajasthan, with a dream. A dream of being tutored at the best coaching institutes there and, thereafter, crack the competitive exam for entrance to the best engineering or medical colleges of India.

But what becomes of the dream after? Shakeel Ridwan Karim, 21, could not make it to the IIT league, but he considers his Kota chapter as the game-changer. Says the student of civil engineering at Aligarh Muslim University, “I couldn’t excel in studies, though I got into a decent college, but that doesn’t mean studying at Kota was a waste of time. It gave me extremely useful life lessons.”

According to Shakeel, at Kota, one is either a poster boy or just another face in the crowd. He says, “Either you are the successful one or you are the guy who is slowly descending into the depths of failure. Maybe you aren’t a failure in the strictest sense of the term, but society labels you thus.”

And it is this fear of a label that overwhelms students and drives them to extremes, the original point of the shift quite lost.

There is no denying that for some time now Kota is synonymous with student suicides. In 2018, reportedly 19 students committed suicide; seven in 2017; and 17 in 2016. 

“It’s not because of bad scores in the JEE Mains... It’s because I’ve started hating myself to the extent that I want to kill myself,” wrote 17-year-old Kriti Tripathi in a note before jumping to her death from a five-storey building this April. She had reportedly urged the government to shut down coaching institutes at the soonest. “They suck,” she wrote.

Ankit Shaw of Calcutta went to Kota after clearing his Class XII boards. He prepared for the IIT-JEE (Indian Institutes of Technology Joint Entrance Examination). He says, “Kota has a very systematic way of teaching. I was in batch 13 — the batch of gap-year students. Batches change every two to three months. If you do not perform well, not only do you not get a better batch, but also face family pressure. The result of every exam is sent to parents.”

Ankit talks about a frenzied pace of teaching, the trouble in keeping up, revising. He says, “I missed having someone I could speak to, who would understand why my performance was deteriorating. But then I think even if I had someone, I wouldn't have had the time to talk.”

Suvam Poddar was in Kota for two years to prepare for the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test). He says, “If a student has failed or taken that extreme step of committing suicide, the institutes are blamed. But it is you [the student or his or her family] who is seeking admission, agreeing to pay the hefty amount to the institutes. They aren’t the ones forcing you to do so.”

Suvam is not the only one who feels this way. Shakeel, too, says that if anything is to be blamed it is the larger education system in the country. Both Suvam and Shakeel feel blaming the place is unfair and list other reasons of failure — peer issues, smartphone addiction, difficulty in adjusting to hostel or paying guest accomodation diet.

During Suvam’s time there, someone he knew committed suicide in his hostel. Recalling that time he says, “Leaving the personal matters of individuals, it’s mainly because of fear and insecurity. External pressure doesn’t let the student breathe properly and somehow he or she falls into the trap of giving up.” Ankit says Kota has toughened him. “It taught me how to go ahead in life, without anyone’s support. Kota teaches one how to function under pressure and, most importantly, it teaches one how to survive.”
Not everyone who passes through Kota and succesfully at that look back with fondness or appreciation. In fact, Shristi Agarwal, who bagged a seat in IIT Kharagpur post Kota, has a caveat for parents. She says, “While the quality of education in Kota institutions is one of the finest in the country, the negatives surrounding the place often override the positives to a point where it may all become toxic. I remember one of my batchmates who was enrolled in a programme that helped students start early, right after primary school. That is the kind of marketing they’ve managed to pull off, the kind of thing parents should understand and stay away from.”

And then not every road to success passes through Kota. Ritesh Kumar Singh, 24, went there after his Plus Two hoping to realise his true potential. He says, “Somewhere along the way I lost my path and it didn’t turn out to be of much help. There was no one to guide me.” Singh is now working in Larsen & Toubro Infotech as a software developer. From all these testimonies one thing is clear — one must weigh the pros and cons before packing the bags for Kota.

‘Kota is not harsh, the competition is’

Kota Factory is a recent Web-series by The Viral Fever (TVF). It captures the life of IIT and medical aspirants as they face both competition and life. The episodes — Inventory, Assembly Line, Optimisation, Shutdown, Overhaul — throw light on what Kota does to its students. The maker of the series, Saurabh Khanna, talks to The Telegraph.

Khanna is a Kota factory product and an IIT Kanpur graduate. He says, “It was a subject we had in mind for years because most core team members have studied there.”

He points out that the series is India’s first black- and-white one. But why? According to Khanna, though the effect is used popularly for period dramas or flashbacks, in this series it is employed to portray a world of stark binaries. He says, “Kota is not harsh, the competition is. The characters were much thought through.” For instance, there is the bright Meena, who is from an underprivileged background and is devoted to books. Then there is Uday, who is intelligent but much too carefree, smoking and partying. Shivangi, Uday’s live-in girlfriend, is representative of the female population in the city — outnumbered by the males, yet significant. Finally, there is Vaibhav, who is the protagonist. Says Khanna, “He is an average guy, who wants to study but he struggles. He is not a genius and he is unable to sit for six hours at a stretch.”

Khanna says he consciously didn’t want the protagonist to be someone who wanted to do photography but ends up doing engineering. “Vaibhav wants to study but does not know how to. And it is difficult when you compete with the world for the first time.”

The monologues in this Web-series sum up the essence of Kota. But the greater aim is to focus on problems such as exam fear that will not let even a good student solve papers, ace an exam. Khanna says, “If you ask me why people go to Kota, I’d say it is for the training and the teachers.”

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

It's Time To Kill NEET And Return Education To The State List - Huffington Post


We as a nation owe an apology to Anitha.

04/09/2017 4:49 PM IST | 
G Pramod Kumar Contributing Editor, HuffPost India
          HINDUSTAN TIMES VIA GETTY IMAGES

There's a lot of anger and anguish that's still erupting in Tamil Nadu over the suicide of Anitha, the Dalit girl who was the visible face of the state's resistance to the central government's national medical entrance examination, the NEET.

For Anitha and thousands of meritorious students like her, who would have otherwise gotten into medical schools, what was snatched away was their hard-earned sovereign right to higher education in an increasingly centralising India.

In a "Union of States", where the architects of our Constitution had rightly ensured that the states had sufficient autonomy to manage their affairs, instruments such as NEET is an anomaly. In the case of Anitha, it was also a symbol for the tyranny of the Centre that took away what rightfully belonged to her and the states. NEET was a strange beast that young people such as Anitha were unable to figure out because her education under the Tamil Nadu Uniform System of School Education (Samacheer Kalvi) was not meant for an unsuitable evaluation of her merit at a national level. NEET was ugly and scary for her and thousands of others.

The Centre Cannot Control Education In States
Presently, NEET is one of the biggest injustices in India's uneven education system. It has created an inappropriate filter that doesn't find real merit, but lets only those with special entitlements pass through. Getting these entitlements, such as crash-training in cracking MCQ requires access to an expensive, premium coaching that people such as Anitha in the hinterlands of India cannot afford. If states such as Tamil Nadu had been able to expand the access to education even to the remotest areas because of years of hard work, filters such as NEET mercilessly roll them back.

Education cannot be taken out of the linguistic, socio-cultural and autonomous context of Indian states.

There was a purpose why the Constitution had left subjects such as education and health - the pillars of human development - with the state government. And that's precisely why every the Indian state has its own "state board" for school education and appropriate syllabi. Education cannot be taken out of the linguistic, socio-cultural and autonomous context of Indian states. In fact, the Kothari Commission, that was convened in the 1960s to advise on education in the country, wanted education to remain with the state despite its recommendation for a nationwide standardisation.

Kerala, the jewel in India's human development story, made all its early strides in education with this autonomy, and Tamil Nadu has produced high quality doctors, surgeons, engineers, scientists and academics with its own educational system and premier institutions. But when it came to NEET, Kerala topped the list in South India with 79.77 pass percentage, while Tamil Nadu fell to the bottom with 41 per cent.

The reason was not quality or merit, but access. This is how unjust NEET is.

Politics Surrounding NEET
Had former Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa been alive, Anitha probably wouldn't have died. Jaya had clearly understood the need for autonomy in education and the unsuitability of entrance examinations in her state. She abolished them in 2005 and had vowed to put an end to NEET if she came back to power in 2016. Although she did return to power, she was mostly sick, and had passed away at a crucial time. Jaya had even promised new legislation if things didn't work. But her legacy-holders - the splintered AIADMK that is obsequious to the BJP-ruled centre for power and safety - are hardly interested.

Even without entrance examinations, Tamil Nadu still tops the country in both quality and numbers of technical talent. Its Anna University campus, which doesn't have an entrance test, is as prestigious and coveted as the IIT in Chennai, and about 1.2 crore students study under Samacheer Kalvi.

A subject in the concurrent list makes both the Centre and the state equal partners, but given the Centre's constitutional upper hand, it never works that way. NEET is a classic example.

Joining the statewide protests against Anitha and NEET, DMK leader MK Stalin has promised to bring education back to the state list and ensure that nobody meets with Anitha's fate again in Tamil Nadu. DMK had been among the most vociferous voices for state autonomy in its early years, but has long since watered down its policy thanks to its opportunistic alliances with national parties that ruled Delhi.

Had DMK been serious, it could have blocked NEET because it was a creation of the UPA. As Jaya once said, the DMK even had a second chance when the UPA government chose to appeal against a Supreme Court verdict that abolished NEET in 2013. In fact, it was during the same time, that Kapil Sibal, the then human resources development minister had developed such fancy ideas of unified screening tests for a complexly diverse country (common entrance exam for all engineering colleges across India that receive some funding from government of India). Creating such standards to national institutions is understandable, but imposing them on state institutions that are built on a different understanding of social justice and development ethic was totally insane. In terms of character, it's similar to the imposition of Hindi, that Tamil Nadu rose against and defeated on multiple occasions.

The only way to escape this absolutist injustice is to bring education back to the state list
In fact, most of the blame for today's mess should go to the Congress because it was Indira Gandhi who shifted education, which had been constitutionally part of the state list, to the concurrent list in 1976. The brutal suzerainty of emergency ensured that there was neither consultations with the states nor, resistance from them. Evidently, the Swaran Singh Committee that recommended such a move because the government then thought education required national policies, reflected Indira Gandhi's emergency ethos of a centralised India. A subject in the concurrent list makes both the Centre and the state equal partners, but given the Centre's constitutional upper hand, it never works that way. NEET is a classic example.

The Way Forward
The only way to escape this absolutist injustice is to bring education back to the state list, a larger campaign for retaining the constitutionally guaranteed autonomy of the states in letter and spirit. It needs icons such as Jaya, who defiantly stood up for the rights of the states. In a country which has Orissa and Kerala - and BIMARU states and southern India - at the two ends of the diverse development spectrum, one size doesn't fit all. Imposing such one sizes is to disincentivise good governance and innovation by enterprising states, and to pull all of them down to sub Saharan standards.

As Jawaharlal Nehru said in his Discovery of India, "India is a geographical and economic entity, a cultural unity amidst diversity, a bundle of contradictions held together by strong but invisible threads." He even called it a "myth and an idea" (Salman Rushdie also said something similar). The constitution embodied this reality, but politics of hegemony chooses to ignore it.

Finally, the NEET-advocates must learn from a tiny Cuba, that's as small as Uttarakhand in terms of population. It doesn't have NEET or any such unreasonable screens, but trains doctors by the thousands, half of them from different parts of the world. They deploy doctors all over the world where they need them, whether it's an Ebola-hit Liberia, where nobody wanted to go, or a Quake-hit Pakistan. It runs world-class institutions in rich countries such as Qatar and poor countries such as Timor Leste.

 Majority of their graduates end up serving government institutions, and hence the poor, because of the value system that they imbibe during their education. (Cuban model also calls for free medical education)

In comparison, in India, absurd centralist policies are killing its homegrown advantages, and the people such as Anitha who co-create them.



Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Depressed over low marks, medical aspirant commits suicide in Kota - Deccan Chronicle

PTI
Published
Dec 1, 2016, 3:48 pm IST

17-year-old Mahima Yadav was found hanging from a ceiling fan at her room in the morning around 7.30 AM.

Representational image

Kota: A 17-year-old girl who was taking coaching at an institute in Kota for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) to get a medical seat allegedly committed suicide by hanging herself at her room in RK Puram area today.

The medical aspirant who hailed from Raiwadi area in Haryana was taking coaching at a premier coaching institute in Kota for about an year.

She was found hanging from a ceiling fan at her room in the morning around 7.30 AM, police said, adding she was living with her mother and brother at the rented accommodation.
Her mother had gone out to drop her brother at school at the time of incident, said Sub Inspector Kamal Singh.

The deceased girl identified as Mahima Yadav was a class XI student and was reportedly depressed over low scoring in routine tests in the institute.

"No suicide note was recovered from the room. However, the girl was reportedly depressed over her low score in the routine tests," Singh said.

The body was sent for the postmortem and further investigation into the matter is underway.

Despite constant efforts by district administration and coaching institute managements to check suicide by the students, at least 15 have taken the extreme step since January this year. This incident has taken the toll to 16 so far.

The district administration has also asked the coaching institutes to conduct screening tests for the students seeking admissions in the institutes and to give their parents an assessment of their ward's chances of cracking the entrance exams of prestigious IIT and medical colleges.

Around 1.75 lakh students from across the country arrive at Kota every year for admission in coaching institutes to prepare for entrance exams to these colleges.