Inspired by Jai Bhim movie, IIT Madras scholar takes up legal battle against co-scholar, others in sexual assault case

Inspired by Jai Bhim movie, IIT Madras scholar takes up legal battle against co-scholar, others in sexual assault case

A 30-year-old research scholar in Tamil Nadu decided to pursue a legal battle against a co-scholar, seven others for sexually assaulting, abusing her, after drawing inspiration from the movie Jai Bhim.

Pramod Madhav

Chennai March 28, 2022



The survivor, who underwent nearly four years of torture, decided to take up legal battle after drawing inspiration from movie Jai Bhim.

A 30-year-old student who was allegedly sexually abused by her fellow scholar and seven other students has taken up a legal battle for justice, after reportedly drawing inspiration from the movie Jai Bhim.

The film Jai Bhim was a talking point for depicting the systemic injustice and cruelties faced by marginalised communities in Tamil Nadu.

The student has mentioned in the FIR the heart-wrenching manner in which she was abused by her fellow scholar Kingshuk Debsharma and seven of his friends.

The student had joined IIT Madras on July 14, 2016 and got acquainted with Kingshuk. She felt comfortable with Kingshuk, as they spoke the same native language, which he took advantage of by sexually assaulting her.

The accused had caused hindrance to the survivor by not allowing her to freely use equipment that forced her to speak with him. In the FIR, the survivor mentioned that using this as a chance, he had called her to the lab on the pretext of resolving the issue. The accused then allegedly sexually abused her, took pictures of her and used them to blackmail her for a period between 2016 and 2020.

The survivor, after undergoing nearly four years of torture, had attempted suicide but was rescued by her friends. The student reportedly did get the full support from her family and had complained to the IIT Madras officials and an Internal Committee was constituted.

The findings of the committee against sexual harassment recorded that the survivor had undergone verbal abuse and was physically abused twice by Kingshuk.

ALSO READ | Suriya's hard-hitting tale about caste injustice and police brutality is a must-watch

The committee findings also reported that Kingshuk’s friends Malay Krishna, Subhadeep Bannerjee, Dr E Ravindran also harassed her. And as an interim recommendation stated that the above-mentioned students should not be permitted to enter the campus, until the survivor completes her thesis.

However, due to the pandemic, classes were conducted online but the accused were not barred from attending it along with the survivor, causing her more trauma.

In a strange turn of events, the survivor then sought the help of Suganthi, State General Secretary of All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA) who stated that the survivor and her friends had watched Jai Bhim movie and had attained hope that they still had a chance to get justice.

A complaint was registered with Mylapore All Women Police Station on March 29 2021 but the FIR had only registered a complaint under sections 354, 354B, 354C and 506 (1) and omitted rape charges as she didn’t explicitly mention the word rape. Furthermore, no charges under Prevention of Atrocities against SC/ST were filed.

"Justice Chandru informed us and also called a senior police official. The survivor then spoke to us and we were shocked to know that no rape charges or POA against SC/ST were filed in the FIR. We were even shocked that the accused had attended online classes along with the survivor even after the Internal Committee had given interim recommendations the other way", stated Suganthi.

After AIDWA took the case, these factors were highlighted and Kingshuk was arrested by Tamil Nadu Police Special Team and is in Diamond Harbour Police station in West Bengal, awaiting a transit warrant.

IIT-Madras Student Suicide: High Court Quashes FIR Against Protesters From Campus Front Of India

IIT-Madras Student Suicide: High Court Quashes FIR Against Protesters From Campus Front Of India Sebin James 9 March 2022 8:30 

No Efforts To Stop Harassment, Suicides: IIT Madras Students

No Efforts To Stop Harassment, Suicides: IIT Madras Students

IITs have become a den of institutional murders, a study by APSC IIT Bombay has claimed.
Sruti M.D.
08 Mar 2022




The death of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras student Fathima Latheef in November 2019 caused tremors on the campus and galvanised students into demanding structural changes in the institute’s administration to prevent such deaths and a more inclusive atmosphere.

The student group ChintaBAR made a three-point demand: studying the mental health of IIT Madras students, expanding the scope of the departmental grievance redressal cell to incorporate harassment and drafting a standard operating procedure to enquire into all deaths on the campus.

Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle (APSC), another student group at IIT Madras, demanded “an active cell containing students, faculty members and employees to address the issues of discrimination against SC, ST, OBC and minority communities”.

Although the institute’s administration promised to work towards fulfilling these demands, another IIT Madras student committed suicide in June 2021.

Shubhankar Dhiman, a 21-year-old aerospace student, committed suicide by hanging himself at his home in Sunder Nagar, Himachal Pradesh, when the campus was shut because of the pandemic and classes were online.

NO EFFORTS MADE BY ADMINISTRATION

Following Latheef’s death, IIT Madras students launched an indefinite fast to ensure that their demands were met. The fast was called off following an assurance by the dean of students that a complaint-and-redressal system will be set up in every department at the earliest and the issues faced by them would be looked into.

Some of the departments already have a grievance redressal cell which functions arbitrarily. “We demanded that the scope of the grievance redressal cell be expanded to include mental harassment and discrimination. It is unclear how these cells function and whether they consist of student representatives,” IIT Madras student Aswin Chadayan told Newsclick.

As for the study on mental health, the ChintaBAR statement read: “A study on the mental health of the students on campus would be conducted by a committee comprising psychologists, educationists, sociologists, etc. as was demanded by the student legislative council.”

Notably, Dhiman’s friends expressed doubts that academic issues could have led to his death as he wasn’t attending classes and could not write the end-of-semester examinations.

Referring to Dhiman’s suicide, Chadayan said, “When an IIT Madras student committed suicide in June last year, we reiterated the study on mental health. We sent out emails to the director and the dean of students. We have not received any reply to the mail till date. We had written to the administration to enquire about the progress of its promises and also sought information on the specific measures taken by the administration to address the issues faced by the students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

CLEAN CHIT DESPITE ACCUSATIONS

A couple of weeks ago, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had submitted its final report on the investigation into Latheef’s death concluding that she committed suicide and ruling out the possibility of mental harassment.

According to the report, Latheef had some psychological issues and took the extreme step due to homesickness. However, her father had alleged that she was subjected to mental torture and harassment which pushed her to commit suicide and pointed out discrepancies in the report.

Similar to the Latheef case, the committee set up to probe Vipin P Veetil’s allegation of discrimination against fellow faculty members found “no evidence of caste bias”. Veetil was an assistant professor at IIT Madras who belongs to a community from Other Backward Classes. 

He rejected the findings alleging caste bias and procedural lapses, and said that key evidence was not considered in the inquiry.

‘DEN OF INSTITUTIONAL MURDERS’

Two deaths by suicide at the institute have been reported in the last 10 months alone—a project staff who was found dead inside the campus and a second-year student committed suicide at home.

Student suicides have been reported at other IITs in Delhi, Bombay and Kharagpur. In January, a 26-year-old postgraduate student of IIT Bombay died after allegedly jumping from the terrace of his hostel. In his suicide note, he had written that no one was responsible for his death.

“IITs have become a den of institutional murders. In 2019 alone, there were 16 institutional murders. These are systematic killings,” claims APSC IIT Bombay.

The IIT campuses have been repeatedly accused of not being inclusive and being elitist dens for upper castes while the marginalised and minorities are sidelined. RTI data shows that none of the IITs allow reservations in faculty positions.