I have a Solution that will reduce pressure on IIT aspirants but do not know how to get this across to HRD Minister of India. Suggestions are welcome. - Ram Krishnaswamy

Search This Blog

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Why Are Student Suicides On A Rise? The Answer May Lie In Unrealistic Academic Standards - Youth Ki Avaaz

Why Are Student Suicides On A Rise? The Answer May Lie In Unrealistic Academic Standards

TRIGGER WARNING: SUICIDE
Recently, board results were declared in India. The sad news is that at least 20 students have died by suicide in Telangana itself possibly due to poor performance. Similar incidents were reported from other states also.
Apart from the board results, every year we come across the news of students committing suicide because of their failure in competitive entrance tests like the IIT-JEE. Such news repeats itself every year, only the statistics change. Such incidents pass largely without significant emphasis or prominence in public discourse. It also does not occupy the central stage in public debates and policy making.
In our society, student suicide, housewives’ suicide, etc. gets sidelined over political issues and is not taken seriously. Whereas farmer suicides take precedence in news reporting owing to their political nature (farmers are a major voting section during election season). Political will in India is informed by electoral logic and this population lot (farmers) is significant for the electoral schema of any political party. Also, public perception exists that farmers’ suicides are the most common form of the malady. It is partly due to media’s emphasis on this vulnerable group as it exposes the inaction of political class and also because it resonates with the livelihood issues of larger section of our population. However, in this case also, suicide as an issue in itself gets neglected.
It perpetuates a narrative that reduces suicide to a manifestation of economic distress. This portrayal fails to sufficiently explain the cause and spread of suicide and does not even address the all important questions of its prevention. Take the example of Rohit Vemula. Although the case galvanised a political wave, the public outburst and widespread media attention were simply against the rampant discrimination against lower-caste Dalits. It couldn’t bring the core issue of suicide to the fore and was sidelined in the agenda of electoral politics.
Let us concentrate on the issue of student suicides (especially those in Class 10 and 12). Here, I see the failure of India’s education system. Every year, we see the number of high-scorers at the school level skyrocketing. It’s good to be thrilled over these incredible scorecards, but I wonder if it really gives the true picture of students’ abilities. I don’t know how written words can be perfect ones, especially when it includes subjects like arts, sciences, and the languages. When the same students start preparing for competitive exams, their abilities receive a reality check and often they can’t tolerate this.
Consider the example of Kota, which is considered to be the coaching capital of India but is gradually becoming a suicidal hotspot for students. Based upon almost-perfect scores, parents burden their kids with unrealistic goals and heap unrealistic praise onto them. Rather than boosting their self-esteem, it gives a false sense of self. It puts pressure on kids and can lead to crippling fear of failure or rejection.


Students attend class at the Bansal Classes in Kota
Students attend class at the Bansal Classes in Kota, in Rajasthan. (Photo: REUTERS/Ahmad Masood)

Unable to cope with failure and being apprehensive about letting their family down, a number of students resort to end their lives. It exposes the emotional cost at which we are making our students chase the family’s expectations beyond their abilities. Also, kids are pampered a lot nowadays. The perception that being unhappy is an abnormal condition creates a lot of inner turmoil. They don’t know how to confront emotions like sadness, frustration, guilt, disappointment, etc. and hence, are not able to comprehend that facing such emotions is a part of learning life skills.
Today’s generation has immersed themselves in the fascinations of the digital world (smart phones and social media). It lets them escape uncomfortable emotions like boredom, loneliness, and sadness. Apart from avoiding discomfort, it also takes away the opportunities to develop mental strength, and coping skills which are needed to handle everyday challenges are never gained.
Take the example of social media. Rather than bonding with real people, kids turn to this virtual world of social media. Although it gives the breadth of friendship on the social network, it does not provide the same depth of intimacy as in the real bonding and instead, a false sense of connection.
Coming back to Kota, there is another psychological aspect to be considered. When these students arrive in the city, they suddenly find themselves amid unknown people and devoid of emotional or moral support from parents and the peer students. In addition to the feeling of being stressed and pressurized, it’s also difficult for them to strike a close bond of friendship when lakhs of them are competing against each other.
Media reporting may also a contributing factor in making suicide as a socially and ethically justifiable way (in the students’ mind) to cope with failure. The depiction of suicide in media can often be irresponsible and inappropriate. This includes detailed descriptions of suicidal acts like reporting unusual methods of suicide, showing pictures or information about the method used, covering celebrity suicides through sensational/dramatic headlines, etc. It normalizes suicide as an acceptable coping medium to emotional crisis, leading to imitative suicidal behaviours.
When one is contemplating suicide, a lack of solace or adequate support from families or social institutions may internsify whatever the person is going through. It is saddening to me that this happens more often than not.
Suicide is a complex issue where socio-economic, cultural, familial and psychological causes are intertwined. It asks for a multi-sectoral action and collective efforts from all stakeholders including immediate family members, public health planners, policymakers, administration and NGOs. The administration should issue guidelines to schools, coaching institutes, etc. such as weekly off to students, fee refunds (in case they want to withdraw from their current course after realizing their true potential/career option), facilitating recreational activities (sessions on yoga, meditation and spiritualism can provide mental equilibrium), etc.
There is also a need for regular monitoring to ensure strict compliance. The panacea for this also lies in raising awareness about mental health and life skills education and these topics should be incorporated into the school curriculum. If children are not aware of these disorders in their formative years (when they are likely to experience more stress and emotional turmoil), how can they be able to cope with it or seek help? The emphasis should also be on the need for better parenting during emotional crises. Humiliations meted out (or just a thought of it) in schools or in social circles are also among the other factors because of which self-esteem decreases.
Educational institutions should recruit trained counsellors and mental-health professionals who can assist students at the onset of emotional and mental problems so they do not escalate into full-fledged diagnoses. Recently, an IAS officer shared his report card on Facebook and advised kids against resorting to suicide. It sends a strong message that parents/kids should not get trapped in this number game of marks and should comprehend the fact that marks are just a passing phase and not the final stamp over anybody’s calibre.  There are more meaningful things to aim for and students should not get disheartened or lose hope, because failures are often the stepping stones to success.
Featured image for representative purpose only.
Featured image source: Prasad Gori/Hindustan Times via Getty Images.

Thursday, May 16, 2019

This IITian shot a documentary on women who broke social barriers by cremating bodies of the deceased

This IITian shot a documentary on women who broke social barriers by cremating bodies of the deceased 

Darpan Bajaj talks about what went into shooting the documentary Maharajin, which also amassed several awards — and he tells us why he wrote the kind of story he eventually did
Rashmi Patil 
Edex Live

Team_2_Darpan
Darpan Bajaj while shooting an interview for Maharajin documentary

A few days ago, when Darpan Bajaj's documentary Maharajin was screened in Bengaluru, the audience seemed delighted with the story. This documentary is a hat tip to none other than late Gulab Tiwari, fondly known as Maharajin bua, the woman who went against religious norms to carry out the funeral rights of the deceased, which is a male-only domain as far as Hindu traditions are concerned. She decided to rise above gender discrimination to follow the tradition of her forefathers who worked on cremation grounds. She worked at the Rasoolabad Ghat in Allahabad for 60 years and legend has it that she saved those who used to visit the ghat to commit suicide. She passed away in 2002 and her son took over the baton.

This idea to shoot Maharajin's documentary came to Darpan when he was pursuing his Master’s in Design and Visual Communication from IIT Guwahati. He says, "We were told to work on a project in the final year. Since my interest was in making documentaries and short movies, I decided to go with it. It was not easy as it was the first time that I had taken on a project like this. But I was excited and searched for ideas with a positive message. Fortunately, one of my friends, Achintya Malviya told me about this woman who carried out cremation rituals for the dead in Allahabad. Initially, I thought I would research about her and narrate a fictional story. However, the story turned out to be unique and my team, Achintya, Arun Sharma and Moksh Krishnan and I, decided to bring it out in the form of a documentary."

Director and editor: Darpan Bajaj is currently working as a UX Designer at Grofers which is an online shopping portal


If you watch Maharajin, you will be surprised to note that throughout the documentary there is no image or photo of Maharajin bua herself. When asked about the reason behind it, Darpan says, "We did not show her face or her old pictures because it is more about her work and we wanted the audience to form their own image of Maharajin rather than we forming it for them." 
For the research, Darpan and his team spoke to poets, philosophers and historians who were originally from Allahabad and had seen her work every day. The documentary starts with a video of an Aghori Sadhu (a small group of Shiva worshippers) sharing his perspective on why women are forbidden from performing cremation of the deceased in Hinduism. He even speaks about the philosophy of life and death. Darpan says, "We shot this movie for five continuous days. While we had planned the rest of the shoots, the scene with the Aghori Sadhu was not planned. When my team and I were at Sangam in Allahabad, we came across the Aghori baba and asked him for his opinion."

From Maharajin: One of the mela scenes from the Maharajin documentary that symbolises life and celebrations


Darpan also spoke to Harishchandra Pandey, a famous poet who has also written a poem on Maharajin. Their documentary ends with Harishchandra reciting this poem which is dedicated to her masculinity. "If he had not written the poem, then we would not have known her. Not just him, we interviewed a few others including Yash Malviya, a famous poet and historian, and writer Lal Bahadur Verma. The most interesting part of the documentary is Lal Bahadur Verma's interview and how he masterfully connects history, philosophy and Maharajin's struggle. Another point to not is that all of them pointed out that Maharajin would see death almost every day and yet, she accepted death as her friend," explains Darpan.

Like every other project that goes through several hurdles before it takes shape, Darpan's documentary also had to go through challenges. Their main concern was procuring equipment like camera and tripod which the institute did not provide. Darpan was able to get a small old recorder from one of his professors. A few professors even suggested that he make a movie on the river Brahmaputra instead and though Darpan found this a tad bit discouraging, he wasn’t disheartened. 

Paint her: The poster of Maharajin was designed by Darpan Bajaj during his final year in IIT Guwahati

 

The documentary was produced under the banner of Moksh Krishnan, who has worked in Bollywood movies as an Assistant Cinematographer and has his own production house called Dastan. "He was able to provide us with Canon EOS 5D Mark III, a tripod and lights. Some of the scenes have also been shot on my Canon EOS 550D and iPhone 6S. The scene of a guy performing Surya Namaskar and a boy jumping into the water are the two fillers which were shot on my iPhone. All the interviews were shot on Canon EOS 5D Mark III which adds a professional look to it. I even bought a Rode Shotgun Mic, but unfortunately, it did not work. We only realised this when Lal Bahadur Verma's interview went unrecorded. We then requested him to give the interview again and told him that we would like him to speak more on the subject because it was so interesting and he agreed! We used an old recorder, but I had to do a lot more to reduce the unnecessary sounds while editing."
From 2017 till date, the movie has been screened in several film festivals and has won many awards. The team won the Best Film Award in Gender category at the 5th Woodpecker International Film Festival 2017, Best Director Award at the 6th Smita Patil Documentary and Short Film Festival, Best Documentary Award at Feel The Reel International Film Festival and a few others. And we are sure that he will keep adding to the list of awards. 

Saturday, May 11, 2019

Cries of Inter students fall on deaf ears - Hans India

Cries of Inter students fall on deaf ears 


Padmaja Shaw


Hans News Service

10 May 2019 4:02 AM


The death toll following the announcement of Intermediate results now has gone up to 24 with almost as many attempted suicides being reported from various parts of the State. The death toll following the announcement of Intermediate results now has gone up to 24 with almost as many attempted suicides being reported from various parts of the State. The government of Telangana, after initial bouts of denial, constituted a committee of three technical experts to probe into the incidents.


The experts said that both the Intermediate Board and its newly acquired technology partner Globarena were responsible for the errors in the results. However, it did not take the board for long to put out a press release claiming that the deaths were not the result of errors.


The evaluation of most of the students who had committed suicides had no major errors, it claimed. Part of the argument also says that the pass percentage is not unusual this year, but the politicisation is. For the government, it is a matter of riding out this storm to go back to business-as-usual. They have done this before. In 2016, the EAMCET paper leaked. A CID probe revealed that close to 90 people – students, parents, and printing presses in other States – were involved.


A dean of a corporate college Sri Chaitanya, and an admission agent of Narayana College were arrested after two years. It was reported that the culprits charged Rs 35 lakh per candidate for helping them get the question papers in advance. This is big money any way you look at it! The investigative agencies were having great difficulty filing charge sheets and prosecuting the culprits. We still do not know the fate of the probe and whether anyone will be prosecuted.


In the early years after the introduction of the common entrance exam for professional courses, students studied at regular Intermediate colleges where Physics, Chemistry, Botany and Zoology laboratories would be available. Weekly schedule of lab work was followed. Students were trained in accurately recording laboratory procedures and recognising various instruments and tools used in scientific experiments. Laboratory work formed a significant part of evaluation of students' comprehension of principles through practical examinations. Many of the old schools and Intermediate colleges still have laboratories and regular lab sessions. The common entrance in the early years required detailed answers, required drawing of diagrams. By early 1990s, fetishization of technical education began in tandem with the neo-liberal push towards privatisation of education. Suddenly, large numbers of private coaching shops began to mushroom across the State of Andhra Pradesh, which concentrated on imparting tricks and tips of cracking the entrance examinations. Soon 100-bit multiple-choice exams were introduced. This mode of evaluation eroded the need for comprehension of concepts and deemphasised the need for language skills. The reverse ripple of this trend distorted the earlier emphasis of school education on language skills and conceptual learning, so much so that now even in schools, much of the evaluation is done through the multiple-choice system.


By conducting centralised exams through multiple-choice questions, making them easily computable, the concern has been merely to produce quick results without real learning outcomes. We hear the debate year after year of engineering and other graduates being unemployable because of lack of language and analytical skills. In 2009, 25 percent weightage was introduced for Intermediate marks as premier engineering schools like BITS Pilani and IITs began to speak up about some of the high scoring students from the coaching shops lacking any exposure to laboratory procedures which an Intermediate student ought to have.


The affiliation application of the Board of Intermediate mentions one acre of land, building in urban areas and two acres of land, building in rural areas. If we close our eyes and remember all the junior colleges we see around us, it is evident that they should not be running those establishments from the second floor of a shopping complex. Most of the chains also do not have science labs. The way they conduct lab work through "mobile and shifting labs" for one week at a time should worry the regulators. In conventional junior colleges, the lab work follows after a topic is taught conceptually. Each week there is a regular schedule of lab sessions for all the science subjects. This is compressed into one convenient week for all topics in coaching centres. The mobile lab moves on to the next branch. At the end of it, how the practical exams are held and marks awarded is a scandal in itself. The government junior colleges are located in large land pieces with buildings, labs and playgrounds. Through deliberate neglect, by not recruiting teachers, by not allocating funds for keeping the existing facilities running, successive governments have undermined the junior college system. The State policies, and the loud publicity campaigns and physical enrolment drives taken up by the private junior colleges have shifted 82 percent of the student base from the State-run system towards the commercial system. To keep ahead of competition, the commercial establishments have not hesitated to indulge in malpractices such the EAMCET leak in 2016, though so far it is being portrayed as the work of rogue staff. Only not-for-profit registered societies are supposed to run educational institutions. Ironically, every debate on the junior college system calls the private colleges "corporate colleges". We have all accepted this rubric for them, therefore, tacitly accepting their right to put an unlawful price on our children's education. The collusion of parents in this short-cut to an elusive prosperous future is the unfortunate part of the story. The worst fallout of this hijack of science stream by corporate colleges is the lasting damage done to other streams. The All India Survey on Higher Education report (2016-17) says that 38 percent enrol in arts, humanities and social science course. Science courses are opted for by 16.7 percent. Engineering and technology by 14.7 percent and commerce by 14.1 percent at the undergraduate level. The prolonged freeze on recruitment in the State sector, cut back on funding for education ensured the closure/merger of junior colleges even as the private colleges entered the scene aggressively capturing the 'market.' Today, the crisis of the results is a consequence of this neglect of State sector. Junior colleges do not have experienced, qualified faulty in adequate numbers to evaluate the nearly ten lakh scripts. Large numbers of ad hoc, temporary teachers and teachers from private colleges are roped in for evaluation. A lot of information about the internal working of the system stands exposed. Parents and teachers have stepped out to protest. The State that regulates this crucial transition point of education must introspect too. Once the protests die down, it should not be business-as-usual.


https://www.thehansindia.com/hans/opinion/cries-of-inter-students-fall-on-deaf-ears--528065

Students must be taught to face failures - Hans India

Students must be taught to face failures
Hans News Service | 10 May 2019 5:12 AM





With over 25 Intermediate students committing suicides across the State, psychiatric experts revealed the main reasons for the students to take such a drastic step and said it was because of the faulty education system, where in students are told to do rote learning rather than understanding the concepts and applying them in the real life.

Mahbubnagar: With over 25 Intermediate students committing suicides across the State, psychiatric experts revealed the main reasons for the students to take such a drastic step and said it was because of the faulty education system, where in students are told to do rote learning rather than understanding the concepts and applying them in the real life. They said the students must be taught to face both success and failures with same spirit as there are various opportunities to excel in life. "The education system that we are adopting today is a faulty system.

Our examination pattern and evaluation methods measure only the capacity of human memory and not to really educate the students about human values, importance of life, or real scientific concepts. Particularly, in Intermediate education, students are subjected to mental pressure right from the beginning which is not good for the students as they may undergo deep mental trauma and depression. Because of which, we are witnessing a large number of suicides by young students," said Dr Srinivas Raju, a psychiatric expert from Mahbubnagar.

Particularly, for the students of science background, they are given the targets of cracking various competitive examinations like Eamcet, NEET, AIEEE and IIT examinations. To train the students to face the tough competitions, parents are joining their children in coaching centres. "Today's parents want their children to get MBBS and engineering seats and they are giving them intense pressure.


The attitude of the general public in the society is that if their children cannot win the competition then there is no respectable life at all. This kind of a negative attitude is very dangerous and because of this, the students who sometimes fail due to untoward circumstances do not have the courage to face the failures and feel insulted in the society. Due this they get into depression and try to take their lives," explained Dr Srinivas Raju.


Recently, an Intermediate student from Narayanpet district who had committed suicide is one typical case wherein it can be said that because of faulty evaluation of Intermediate examination, she was declared fail and not able to bear that insult, she committed suicide. Out of eight lakh students who had taken Intermediate exams in Telangana, as many as 3 lakh are declared failed. This kind of an mass failure of Inter students is seen for the first time. "The deaths of more than 25 intermediate students are because of the wrong evaluation method. The State government must take responsibility for this and must pay Rs 25 lakh as compensation to kin of each of the deceased student.


The culprits behind this fiasco must be published severely," demanded BJP leader Kishan Reddy, during a condolence meeting in Narayanpet recently. As the 10th class results are also awaited, the Commissionaire of Education has already given instruction to all the teachers in the government and private education institutions to conduct student-parents meeting and provide counselling to them so that no such untoward incidents like suicides take place.


https://www.thehansindia.com/telangana/students-must-be-taught-to-face-failures-528112

Wednesday, May 8, 2019

Behind Telangana’s 23 student suicides is an education system fixated on cracking entrance tests - Scrtoll.In

Behind Telangana’s 23 student suicides is an education system fixated on cracking entrance tests



The deaths have followed the announcement of the intermediate exam results on April 18.

Kukatla Praveen and his mother in a hospital in Venkataraopalli, Karimnagar. | S Senthalir


Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Student Counseling Services: Do They Really Help the ‘Mentally Ill’? By Varun DhimanMarch - Mad In America




Student Counseling Services: Do They Really Help the ‘Mentally Ill’?

Let me begin with a story.
Once upon a time, in a college, there was a boy and a girl. Both strangers, the boy and the girl were passing thorough the university corridor when they bumped into each other. The boy fell down. The girl fell down. When they got up and saw each other, it was love at first sight. And after that they started spending their time together. Many months passed. The boy finally proposed to the girl. But the girl rejected him. She broke his heart. The boy wasn’t able to face this rejection. He slipped into depression. He started using drugs, alcohol, and cigarettes to escape from his depression. His academic performance declined. His mentor (a senior) saw his behavior and took him to the counseling center. He received some counseling and things started improving. He started to attend classes again, went to the library, and started scoring good marks. He quit drugs, smoking, and alcohol. He overcame his broken heart. He became happy again. He graduated from the university. Happy Ending.
This was the story that was shown to me in a video on orientation day when I came to the university as a freshman. I was just 17 years old then. This was the image in my mind before visiting the counseling center: The center helps the students when they are going through a tough time, the center tries to solve the root cause of the problems of the students, the center is purely confidential and personal information is not shared with anyone. Overall the center had a positive image in my mind.
But I realize now that it was just a marketing strategy employed by the counseling center to attract troubled students. This video did not give the real picture of the functioning of the counseling center.
Many people including my fellow students do not know the reality about the counseling center. Whenever they see someone struggling with their inner problems, they advise them to visit the counseling center. The reason being the conditioning of students by the college and the counseling center with their utopian propaganda.
What I have experienced: Confidentiality is a myth in the counseling center. They say that your personal information is not shared with anybody. Anybody means ANYBODY. What they don’t say is that they are allowed to break confidentiality when they see you as a threat to yourself (like the possibility of committing suicide) or to others. Generally they contact the parents of the students whom they think might need some psychiatric help.
Back then I was an optimistic person. I used to think that the counseling center would help me to resolve my inner conflicts. That visiting the center would do some good for me. I have since realized that most mainstream “mental health” is more damaging than helpful.
At first, I did not think that there would be any stigma attached with the counseling center. I thought all sorts of people go there. It was also written on the university website that people who visit the counseling center aren’t mad or weak, rather they are showing some willingness to solve their problems. I never realized the stigma until I went there myself.
The decision to visit the counseling center has played a very crucial role in my life. It was like giving my future into somebody else’s hands.
At the center, I met the student counselor. She handed me a form with a questionnaire to fill out. We had a conversation, most of the details of which I don’t remember. When I filled out the form she asked me for the contact number of a friend. I gave the contact number of a senior girl to the counselor. The counselor called and asked her to come around 4 o’clock.
These days if the student counselors see any problem with a student visiting the center, they send him or her to see a psychiatrist.
The counselor told my friend that I needed help, that if the Deans saw me in this condition, they would tell me to go home. They were there to ‘help’ me. So the duty of the senior girl was to take me to the hospital to see the psychiatrist. And that day I and the psychiatrist had a long conversation, and in the end he prescribed me some sort of antipsychotics. Now I had to take these pills.
That night I received a call from the senior saying that according to the counselor, I had to go back home because it was vacation and I not had been allowed to stay alone on the campus. I had to leave campus and come back with my parents when the next semester started.
You see, when you reach out to the counseling center, they can even interfere in your personal life and your college life. You have disclosed your most private secrets to somebody and somebody used your secrets.
What is a better option instead of visiting the counseling center? Do seek any professional help if you need it, but don’t go somewhere your information might be used against you. Visiting a therapist outside the campus is less of a problem because at least they can’t interfere in your college life and put restrictions on your freedom.
I had not told my parents about me taking medications, visiting the counseling center or seeing the psychiatrist.
I took the medication for some days and I was feeling different. It was as if someone had put tape to my mouth and I could not smile much. It was the side effects of the medications. I visited the counseling center again to tell the counselors that I was feeling the side effects. They did not believe me. They thought it was the disease returning. They thought that I was not taking my medications. So they called my parents.
My parents arrived and they were told to sign a semester withdrawal form. The reason which was given by the counseling center people to my parents was that my mental state could get worse if I stayed there. They were forcing me to take a semester withdrawal. The counseling centers among all the universities have the same policy. Students are told to leave when they feel suicidal or mentally troubled. Students of Princeton and Stanford University were treated the same — they were told to go home when they visited the counseling center.
My parents and I did not like the idea of semester withdrawal. We thought it would be better to consult the psychiatrist. I had good grades. The psychiatrist, based on my previous academic records, told me not to take the semester withdrawal as I could perform well in the semester. So I did not take the semester withdrawal.
But my parents were told to stay with me in the apartments inside the college so that one of my parents (my mother) could monitor me taking the medications. I had to vacate the hostel I was staying in. I feel this amounted to discrimination against people with a mental illness.
The counseling center people are so smart that they even signed my signature and my parents’ signature on an application written in the first person, from my point of view, saying that I take the responsibilities of all my actions. That meant if I happened to commit suicide, the center had the record so that no blame could be put on the college administration. What I feel is that they were trying to protect the college’s reputation in case I committed suicide. However, I did not think they helped me even a little bit in resolving my conflicts.
They just order the semester withdrawal so that you can swallow the medications at your home. In my home university, taking a semester withdrawal on this basis is not a good option. They won’t return your tuition fees if you withdraw midway through the semester. The maximum that can happen when you don’t take a semester withdrawal is that you fail every course, meaning you earn no credit, but you would also not get any course credit if you do take the semester withdrawal. And the next semester when you come back to join the institute again, you are required to meet the counselor to prove that you are in good mental condition to continue your studies. A Stanford University student had to write an essay to say that he was in a good condition to return and in a way had to take the blame on himself. You would have to submit your medical report to the counselor. A Princeton University student even tried to sue the university for discriminating against him on the basis of mental health.
The counseling center people argued that so many people came to the counseling center and given the number of students visiting the center and the number of counselors, solving everyone’s problems would take a much longer time. It is not possible to help each and everybody effectively. I agree on this point.
Finally, I would like to summarize my terrible journey through the counseling center of my home university:
Do I regret going to the counseling center? Yes, I do.
Were my inner conflicts resolved? No.
Was my privacy intruded on by the counseling center? Yes, many times.
Were other students told about my mental illness? Yes.
Was my confidentiality broken? Yes, many times.
Do they really help the ‘mentally ill’? Not at the core, no.
What counseling centers generally do:
Give you a semester withdrawal (sometimes forced semester withdrawal).
Give you an accommodation where you can live with one of your parents who can monitor you taking medications (sometimes forcing students to take medications).
Keep your personal medical records with them.
Would I recommend anybody to visit the counseling center? Not highly recommended. Proceed at your own risk.